Police-Community Relations in Cincinnati: Year Three Evaluation Report
Abstract
In 2002, the Cincinnati Police Department (CPD), the Fraternal Order of Police, and the ACLU joined together in a collaborative agreement to resolve social conflict, improve community relations, and avoid litigation. This third-year evaluation reports that blacks continue to bear a disproportionate share of the impact of policing services by virtue of the clustering of crime, calls for service, and policing in predominantly black neighborhoods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It may not be possible to field a proactive enforcement strategy that is racially neutral.
“While it may not be possible to field a proactive enforcement strategy that is racially neutral”
From Police-Community Relations in Cincinnati (2009) · cites this paper as Schell et al., 2007
Vortex officers were more likely to stop vehicles with black drivers than were other non-Vortex officers patrolling at the same times and places (71 percent versus 65 percent).
“Our 2006 analysis of this group's practices (Schell et al., 2007, pp. 46-48) found that Vortex officers were more likely to stop vehicles with black drivers than were other non-Vortex officers patrolling at the same times and places (71 percent versus 65 percent).”
From Police-Community Relations in Cincinnati (2009) · cites this paper as Schell et al., 2007
Such no-contraband high-discretion searches can contribute to blacks' perceptions of unfair policing.
“This can contribute to blacks' perceptions of unfair policing that were identified in last year's report (Schell et al., 2007).”
From Police-Community Relations in Cincinnati (2009) · cites this paper as Schell et al., 2007
Crime continues to be concentrated in primarily black neighborhoods.
“Crime continues to be concentrated in primarily black neighborhoods”
From Police-Community Relations in Cincinnati (2009) · cites this paper as Schell et al., 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Police-Community Relations in Cincinnati
Ridgeway, G., Schell, T., Gifford, B., Saunders, J., Turner, S., Riley, K., & Dixon, T. (2009) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/mg853 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Schell, T., Ridgeway, G., Dixon, T., Turner, S., & Riley, K.
- Venue
- RAND Corporation eBooks
- Publisher
- RAND Corporation
- Published
- 2007
- OpenAlex
- W4250453639
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- RAND Corporation eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- police-community relations, African American community, racial disparities in policing, crime clustering, calls for service, police-community partnership, social conflict resolution, litigation avoidance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review