Cited by 228Political Economy and MarxismCultural Studies and PostmodernismDigital Economy and Work Transformation

The Valorization of Surveillance: Towards a Political Economy of Facebook

Open access
Cohen, Nicole·2008·University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries

Abstract

Much excitement surrounds Facebook, the social networking site based on user-generated content that has attracted 64 million active users since its inception in 2004. This paper begins to outline a political economy of Facebook in an attempt to draw attention to the underlying economic relations that structure the website, and the way in which the site fits into larger patterns of contemporary capitalist development. Although Web 2.0 has presented a shift away from “old” top-down media models, there remains continuity through change: Facebook continues familiar models of extensive commodification, with surveillance playing a key role in this process. The emerging reliance on general intellect and free labour for the purpose of capital accumulation does represent a move away from a more passive conception of the audience commodity, yet it demonstrates the continuous march of capitalism into cyberspace under post-Fordist conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.7275/democratic-communique.290

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Johnston, Garth. 2007. Comcast site teams with Facebook. Broadcasting & Cable 137(7): 16.
  2. Kessler, Andy. 2007. The weekend interview with Mark Zuckerberg: Network so- lutions. Wall Street Journal, March 24.
  3. Lazzarato, Maurizio. 1996. Immaterial labour. In Radical Thought in Italy: A po- tential politics eds. Paolo Virno and Michael Hardt, 133-147. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  4. Lazzarato, Maurizio. 2004. From capital-labour to capital-life. Ephemera 4(3): 187- 208.
  5. Liedtke, Michael. 2007. Is Facebook the next big deal? Associated Press, February 23.
  6. Zuckerberg, Mark. 2007. Keynote speech delivered at the f8 conference at the San Francisco Design Centre. Available at http://developers.facebook.com/ videos.php (accessed 2/16/2008).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, N.
Corresponding author
Cohen, Nicole
Venue
University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries
Publisher
University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries
Published
2008
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
5-5
OpenAlex
W1569869845
Cited by
228
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 25
FWCI
28.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
  • Democratic Communiqué
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Keywords
Facebook, surveillance capitalism, commodification, Web 2.0, general intellect, free labor, capital accumulation, post-Fordism, audience commodification, user-generated content

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review