The DOI matches its Crossref record.
3. Blissfully Buddhist and Betrothed: Marriage in the Vessantara Jātaka and Other South and Southeast Asian Buddhist Narratives
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The academic study of Buddhist literature has not given romantic love much consideration.
“The academic study of Buddhist literature has not given romantic love much consideration.”
From Buddhist Love Story: The Buddha and Yasodhara (2020) · cites this paper as McDaniel 2016
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Buddhist Love Story: The Buddha and Yasodhara
Sasson, V. R. (2020) · Buddhist Studies Review · doi:10.1558/bsrv.18496 · Cited by 3
Khatun, M., Islam, M. M., & Khatun, M. B. (2025) · Journal of Psychosociological Research in Family and Culture · doi:10.61838/kman.jprfc.3.1.1
Metadata
- Authors
- McDaniel, J. T.
- Corresponding author
- McDaniel, Justin Thomas
- Venue
- Readings of the Vessantara Jataka
- Publisher
- Columbia University Press
- Published
- 2016-12-31
- Pages
- 81-99
- OpenAlex
- W2521539617
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Columbia University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval Literature and History
- Keywords
- Vessantara Jataka, marriage, Buddhist narrative, Jataka tales, South Asian Buddhism, Southeast Asian Buddhism, betrothal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
