10.1. Fossil Hippopotamidae from Lothagam
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cranial and dental measurements of C. liberiensis (n = 20-30) are consistent with the morphology of browsers.
“The cranial and dental measurements (cm, ranges) of C. liberiensis (n = 20-30) are consistent with the morphology of browsers (Weston 2000(Weston , 2003)):”
From Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae) (2019) · cites this paper as Weston 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
BOISSERIE, J.-R. (2005) · Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00138.x · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae)
Flacke, G. L., & Decher, J. (2019) · Mammalian Species · doi:10.1093/mspecies/sez017 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Weston, E. M.
- Corresponding author
- Weston, Eleanor M.
- Venue
- Lothagam
- Publisher
- Columbia University Press
- Published
- 2003-12-31
- Pages
- 441-484
- OpenAlex
- W2523687302
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Columbia University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Keywords
- hippopotamus, Late Pleistocene
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
