12. Economic Analysis of Wildlife Use in the Peruvian Amazon
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the Amazon Basin, large rodents and medium-sized ungulates such as brocket deer and peccaries typically make up the bulk of the harvest, although the hunting of a few tapir can be very important in biomass terms.
“Similarly, in the Amazon Basin, large rodents (Dasyprocta spp.and Cunniculus paca) and medium-sized ungulates such as brocket deer (Mazama spp.) and peccaries (Tayassu pecari and Pecari tajacu.12-45 kg) typically make up the bulk of the harvest, although the hunting of a few tapir (ca.200 kg) can be very important in biomass terms (Bodmer and Lozano 2001, Bodmer et al. 2004, Ojasti 2000, Peres 200”
From Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins (2011) · cites this paper as Bodmer et al. 2004
For hunters, the distinction between subsistence and commercial use is often blurred, with meat from the forest supplementing both diets and incomes.
“For hunters, the distinction between subsistence and commercial use is often blurred, with meat from the forest supplementing both diets and incomes (e.g.Bodmer and Lozano 2001, Bodmer et al. 2004, Kümpel et al. 2010b, 2010c).”
From Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins (2011) · cites this paper as Bodmer et al. 2004
Bodmer et al. (2004) estimated the number of animals hunted annually in the Peruvian Amazon (Loreto region) as above 110 000.
“Bodmer et al. (2004) estimated the number of animals hunted annually in the Peruvian Amazon (Loreto region) as above 110 000 but how much of this catch is sold through open-markets is almost impossible to estimate.”
From Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins (2011) · cites this paper as Bodmer et al. (2004)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins
Nasi, R., Taber, A., & Van Vliet, N. (2011) · International Forestry Review · doi:10.1505/146554811798293872 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bodmer, R. E., Lozano, E. P., & Fang, T. G.
- ORCID
- Bodmer, Richard E.
- Venue
- People in Nature
- Publisher
- Columbia University Press
- Published
- 2004-12-31
- Pages
- 191-208
- OpenAlex
- W36535601
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Columbia University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wildlife Conservation Society
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
- Keywords
- wildlife use, economic analysis, Peruvian Amazon, wildlife economics, subsistence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review