Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of the Thyroid: The Problem of Suspicious Cytologic Findings

GHARIB, HOSSEIN, GOELLNER, JOHN R., ZINSMEISTER, ALAN R., GRANT, CLIVE S., VAN HEERDEN, JON A.·1984·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Cases in which thyroid nodules yielded suspicious cytologic findings on fine-needle aspiration biopsy were prospectively studied during a 3-year period. Of 1970 patients, 333 (17%) had suspicious cytologic findings; from this group, the cases of 253 patients were studied. The cytologic diagnoses were 96 (38%) H urthle cell neoplasms, 84 (33%) follicular cell neoplasms, and 73 (29%) nonspecific diagnoses. A thyroid scan was obtained in 123 of 203 (61%) patients with a solitary nodule, and the nodules were hypofunctional in 102 (83%). Malignant lesions were found in 60 (24%) of the 253 patients. Our findings are consistent with reports that 20% of patients who have a fine-needle aspiration biopsy will have suspicious cytologic findings and that of these, 20% may have a malignant lesion. Thyroid scanning will not distinguish between benign and malignant thyroid lesions that are suspicious on cytologic examination. Surgical excision of all suspicious lesions seems reasonable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-101-1-25

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
GHARIB, H., GOELLNER, J. R., ZINSMEISTER, A. R., GRANT, C. S., & VAN HEERDEN, J. A.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1984-07-01
Volume
101
Issue
1
Pages
25-28
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2022956315
Cited by
258
References
0
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of the Thyroid: The Problem of Suspicious Cytologic Findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-101-1-25
The paper
GHARIB, H., GOELLNER, J. R., ZINSMEISTER, A. R., GRANT, C. S., & VAN HEERDEN, J. A. (1984). Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of the Thyroid: The Problem of Suspicious Cytologic Findings. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-101-1-25

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.