The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of the Thyroid: The Problem of Suspicious Cytologic Findings
Abstract
Cases in which thyroid nodules yielded suspicious cytologic findings on fine-needle aspiration biopsy were prospectively studied during a 3-year period. Of 1970 patients, 333 (17%) had suspicious cytologic findings; from this group, the cases of 253 patients were studied. The cytologic diagnoses were 96 (38%) H urthle cell neoplasms, 84 (33%) follicular cell neoplasms, and 73 (29%) nonspecific diagnoses. A thyroid scan was obtained in 123 of 203 (61%) patients with a solitary nodule, and the nodules were hypofunctional in 102 (83%). Malignant lesions were found in 60 (24%) of the 253 patients. Our findings are consistent with reports that 20% of patients who have a fine-needle aspiration biopsy will have suspicious cytologic findings and that of these, 20% may have a malignant lesion. Thyroid scanning will not distinguish between benign and malignant thyroid lesions that are suspicious on cytologic examination. Surgical excision of all suspicious lesions seems reasonable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haugen, B. R., Alexander, E. K., Bible, K. C., Doherty, G. M., Mandel, S. J., Nikiforov, Y. E., Pacini, F., Randolph, G. W., Sawka, A. M., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2016) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020 · Cited by 16,535
Cooper, D. S., Doherty, G. M., Haugen, B. R., Kloos, R. T., Lee, S. L., Mandel, S. J., Mazzaferri, E. L., McIver, B., Pacini, F., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2009) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2009.0110 · Cited by 6,707
BRAF mutation in thyroid cancer
Xing, M. (2005) · Endocrine Related Cancer · doi:10.1677/erc.1.0978 · Cited by 1,300
Management of Simple Nodular Goiter: Current Status and Future Perspectives
Hegedüs, L., Bonnema, S. J., & Bennedbæk, F. N. (2003) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2002-0016 · Cited by 710
DANESE, D., SCIACCHITANO, S., FARSETTI, A., ANDREOLI, M., & PONTECORVI, A. (1998) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.1998.8.15 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- GHARIB, H., GOELLNER, J. R., ZINSMEISTER, A. R., GRANT, C. S., & VAN HEERDEN, J. A.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1984-07-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-28
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2022956315
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of the Thyroid: The Problem of Suspicious Cytologic Findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-101-1-25
- The paper
- GHARIB, H., GOELLNER, J. R., ZINSMEISTER, A. R., GRANT, C. S., & VAN HEERDEN, J. A. (1984). Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of the Thyroid: The Problem of Suspicious Cytologic Findings. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-101-1-25
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.