The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pneumococcal Vaccine Efficacy in Selected Populations in the United States
Abstract
The efficacy of pneumococcal vaccine in groups of patients in the United States at high risk for pneumococcal disease was estimated by comparing distributions of serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from vaccinated and unvaccinated persons. Between May 1978 and March 1984, 187 blood isolates and 62 cerebrospinal fluid isolates from vaccinated patients, and 1447 blood isolates and 191 cerebrospinal fluid isolates from unvaccinated patients were serotyped at the Centers for Disease Control. The study did not include patients who were less than 2 years old or who had Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, or immunoglobulin deficiency. In patients with bacteremic disease, the overall efficacy of pneumococcal vaccine was estimated at 64% (95% confidence limits, 47% to 76%); efficacy did not differ significantly with age. In persons over 65 years of age with diabetes mellitus, chronic heart disease, pulmonary disease, or no underlying illnesses, efficacy was 61% (95% confidence limits, 1% to 85%). These findings support the use of pneumococcal vaccine in selected populations in the United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hao (2015) · doi:10.1002/14651858 · Cited by 11,321
The Protective Efficacy of Polyvalent Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine
Shapiro, E. D., Berg, A. T., Austrian, R., Schroeder, D., Parcells, V., Margolis, A., Adair, R. K., & Clemens, J. D. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199111213252101 · Cited by 1,051
Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Antimicrobial Treatment of Acute Bacterial Meningitis
Brouwer, M. C., Tunkel, A. R., & van de Beek, D. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00070-09 · Cited by 930
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: Efficacy of selenium treatment for sepsis
Li, S., Tang, T., Guo, P., Zou, Q., Ao, X., Hu, L., & Tan, L. (2019) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000014733 · Cited by 802
Bacterial Infection in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Murphy, T. F., & Sethi, S. (1992) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/146.4.1067 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- BOLAN, G., BROOME, C. V., FACKLAM, R. R., PLIKAYTIS, B. D., FRASER, D. W., & SCHLECH, W. F.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1986-01-01
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W1971646678
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pneumococcal Vaccine Efficacy in Selected Populations in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-104-1-1
- The paper
- BOLAN, G., BROOME, C. V., FACKLAM, R. R., PLIKAYTIS, B. D., FRASER, D. W., & SCHLECH, W. F. (1986). Pneumococcal Vaccine Efficacy in Selected Populations in the United States. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-104-1-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.