The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Removal of Nosocomial Pathogens from the Contaminated Glove: Implications for Glove Reuse and Handwashing
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of three different types of handcleansing agents in decontaminating gloved hands that were inoculated with a series of four nosocomial pathogens. DESIGN: A controlled, experimental trial. SETTING: Tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Five healthy volunteers participated in all portions of the study. INTERVENTIONS: A standard concentration of one of four representative nosocomial pathogens was placed on the gloved hand, spread, and allowed to dry. One of three different handcleansing agents--a nonmedicated soap, a 60% isopropyl alcohol preparation, or 4% chlorhexidine gluconate--was used to cleanse the gloves, which were cultured using a broth-bag technique. The gloves were then removed and the hands were cultured in a similar manner. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The handwashing agents reduced the median log10 counts of organisms to 2.1 to 3.9 after an inoculation of 10(7) colony forming units. The proportion of positive glove cultures for Staphylococcus aureus, 8% to 100%; Serratia marcescens, 16% to 100%; and Candida albicans, 4% to 60% varied greatly after use of the different handcleansers (P less than 0.001), and varied considerably for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 20% to 48% (P = 0.085). After the gloves were removed, the differences among the observed proportions of hands contaminated with the test organisms varied from 5% to 50%, depending on the handcleansing agent used (P less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the era of universal precautions these data suggest that it may not be prudent to wash and reuse gloves between patients. Further, handwashing is strongly encouraged after removal of gloves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings
Boyce, J. M., & Pittet, D. (2002) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1067/mic.2002.130391 · Cited by 2,120
Evidence-based model for hand transmission during patient care and the role of improved practices
Pittet, D., Allegranzi, B., Sax, H., Dharan, S., Pessoa-Silva, C. L., Donaldson, L., & Boyce, J. M. (2006) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(06)70600-4 · Cited by 790
APIC guidelines for handwashing and hand antisepsis in health care settings
Larson, E. L. (1995) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/0196-6553(95)90070-5 · Cited by 771
Improving Compliance With Hand Hygiene in Hospitals
Pittet, D. (2000) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/501777 · Cited by 521
Metadata
- Authors
- Doebbeling, B. N., Pfaller, M. A., Houston, A. K., & Wenzel, R. P.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1988-09-01
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 394-398
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2088568221
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Removal of Nosocomial Pathogens from the Contaminated Glove: Implications for Glove Reuse and Handwashing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-109-5-394
- The paper
- Doebbeling, B. N., Pfaller, M. A., Houston, A. K., & Wenzel, R. P. (1988). Removal of Nosocomial Pathogens from the Contaminated Glove: Implications for Glove Reuse and Handwashing. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-109-5-394
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.