Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is Liver Biopsy Useful in the Evaluation of Patients with Chronically Elevated Liver Enzymes?

Van Ness, Michael M., Diehl, Anna Mae·1989·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic usefulness of percutaneous liver biopsy in evaluating patients with chronically elevated liver-associated enzymes. DESIGN: Comparison of diagnosis made before biopsy by one physician on the basis of a noninvasive work-up (history, physical examination, laboratory values, and imaging studies) and final diagnosis made after biopsy by a second physician formulated after review of all available noninvasive information and study of the biopsy specimen. SETTING: Referral-based gastroenterology clinic at a U.S. Navy medical center. PATIENTS: Sequential sample of 107 patients with elevated liver-associated enzymes for a minimum of 3 months. Ninety patients were eligible for study. INTERVENTIONS: The final diagnosis made by the second physician blinded to the first clinician's diagnosis served as the criterion standard. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four diagnostic groups were selected for analysis: Alcoholic liver disease, fatty liver, chronic necroinflammatory diseases, and miscellaneous. The positive predictive value of the prebiopsy diagnosis ranged from 88% (CI, 75% to 100%) for alcoholic liver disease to 56% (CI, 37% to 75%) for fatty liver. Higher elevations of transaminase values (greater than three times the upper limit of normal) correlated positively with increased prebiopsy diagnostic accuracy. Fatty liver was present in 19% of the cohort. Liver diseases requiring specific therapy other than alcohol abstinence were overlooked and diagnosed only after review of the biopsy in five cases. Conversely, four cases of liver disease, thought to require specific therapy on the basis of noninvasive work-up, were ruled out by biopsy. CONCLUSION: The cause of chronic liver disease is best elucidated when the noninvasive work-up is complemented by review of a biopsy specimen.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-111-6-473

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Van Ness, M. M., & Diehl, A. M.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1989-09-15
Volume
111
Issue
6
Pages
473-478
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1553389211
Cited by
213
References
2
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is Liver Biopsy Useful in the Evaluation of Patients with Chronically Elevated Liver Enzymes? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-111-6-473
The paper
Van Ness, M. M., & Diehl, A. M. (1989). Is Liver Biopsy Useful in the Evaluation of Patients with Chronically Elevated Liver Enzymes? Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-111-6-473

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.