The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is Liver Biopsy Useful in the Evaluation of Patients with Chronically Elevated Liver Enzymes?
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic usefulness of percutaneous liver biopsy in evaluating patients with chronically elevated liver-associated enzymes. DESIGN: Comparison of diagnosis made before biopsy by one physician on the basis of a noninvasive work-up (history, physical examination, laboratory values, and imaging studies) and final diagnosis made after biopsy by a second physician formulated after review of all available noninvasive information and study of the biopsy specimen. SETTING: Referral-based gastroenterology clinic at a U.S. Navy medical center. PATIENTS: Sequential sample of 107 patients with elevated liver-associated enzymes for a minimum of 3 months. Ninety patients were eligible for study. INTERVENTIONS: The final diagnosis made by the second physician blinded to the first clinician's diagnosis served as the criterion standard. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four diagnostic groups were selected for analysis: Alcoholic liver disease, fatty liver, chronic necroinflammatory diseases, and miscellaneous. The positive predictive value of the prebiopsy diagnosis ranged from 88% (CI, 75% to 100%) for alcoholic liver disease to 56% (CI, 37% to 75%) for fatty liver. Higher elevations of transaminase values (greater than three times the upper limit of normal) correlated positively with increased prebiopsy diagnostic accuracy. Fatty liver was present in 19% of the cohort. Liver diseases requiring specific therapy other than alcohol abstinence were overlooked and diagnosed only after review of the biopsy in five cases. Conversely, four cases of liver disease, thought to require specific therapy on the basis of noninvasive work-up, were ruled out by biopsy. CONCLUSION: The cause of chronic liver disease is best elucidated when the noninvasive work-up is complemented by review of a biopsy specimen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fatty liver hepatitis and cirrhosis in obese patients
Adler, M., & Schaffner, F. (1979) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(79)90740-x · Cited by 399
Nakanuma, Y., & Ohta, G. (1979) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(79)90396-2 · Cited by 213
Cited by
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Angulo, P. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra011775 · Cited by 5,228
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a spectrum of clinical and pathological severity.
MATTEONI, C., YOUNOSSI, Z., GRAMLICH, T., BOPARAI, N., LIU, Y., & MCCULLOUGH, A. (1999) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70506-8 · Cited by 3,345
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Adams, L. A. (2005) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.045232 · Cited by 1,610
AGA technical review on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Sanyal, A. J. (2002) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.2002.36572 · Cited by 1,072
Harrison, S. A., Oliver, D., Arnold, H. L., Gogia, S., & Neuschwander-Tetri, B. A. (2008) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2007.146019 · Cited by 869
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Ness, M. M., & Diehl, A. M.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1989-09-15
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 473-478
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W1553389211
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is Liver Biopsy Useful in the Evaluation of Patients with Chronically Elevated Liver Enzymes? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-111-6-473
- The paper
- Van Ness, M. M., & Diehl, A. M. (1989). Is Liver Biopsy Useful in the Evaluation of Patients with Chronically Elevated Liver Enzymes? Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-111-6-473
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.