Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Secretin and Calcium Provocative Tests in the Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome: A Prospective Study

Frucht, Harold, Howard, John M., Slaff, James I., Wank, Steven A., McCarthy, Denis M., Maton, Paul N., Vinayek, Rakesh, Gardner, Jerry D., Jensen, Robert T.·1989·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate criteria of positivity for and usefulness of both the secretin and calcium gastrin-provocative tests in patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. DESIGN: Prospective trial in consecutive patients. SETTING: Referrals to a clinical research center. PATIENTS: Consecutive sample of 80 patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. INTERVENTION: Kabi-secretin (2 U/kg body weight) given by intravenous bolus and calcium gluconate (10%) (54 mg/kg.h [5 mg/kg.h of calcium]) given by continuous intravenous infusion for 3 hours. Serum gastrin measured at -15, and -1 minutes before, and 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes after secretin, or every 30 minutes for 3 hours during the calcium infusion. Serum calcium and serum gastrin were measured simultaneously during the calcium infusion. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the responses of patients with different extents or locations of the tumor, presence or absence of multiple endocrine neoplasia, type-I, or with fasting gastrin less than or greater than 1000 pg/mL. In patients with fasting gastrin of less than 1000 pg/mL, the sensitivity of the secretin test using the criterion of an increase in gastrin of at least 110 pg/mL was 93% (CI, 76% to 99%) and for an increase of 200 pg/mL it was 85% (CI, 66% to 96%), (P greater than 0.05). With the calcium infusion test, the sensitivity using the criterion of an increase of 395 pg/mL was 43%, (CI, 23% to 66%) and for an increase of 50% was 74% (CI, 52% to 90%), (P less than 0.01). The calcium infusion test was positive in 33% of patients with a negative secretin test. With the secretin test, 75% of patients had a positive response by 5 minutes, 95% by 10 minutes, 100% by 15 minutes, and 6% only at 2 minutes. With calcium infusion, patients had positive responses at 120 to 180 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The secretin test is preferred over the calcium test because of its greater sensitivity and simplicity. The recommended criteria are a 200 pg/mL increase for the secretin test and a 395 pg/mL increase for the calcium test. The calcium test should be reserved for patients having a negative secretin test, gastric acid hypersecretion, and a strong clinical suspicion of the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-111-9-713

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Frucht, H., Howard, J. M., Slaff, J. I., Wank, S. A., McCarthy, D. M., Maton, P. N., Vinayek, R., Gardner, J. D., & Jensen, R. T.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1989-11-01
Volume
111
Issue
9
Pages
713-722
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1973099367
Cited by
184
References
0
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Secretin and Calcium Provocative Tests in the Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome: A Prospective Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-111-9-713
The paper
Frucht, H., Howard, J. M., Slaff, J. I., Wank, S. A., McCarthy, D. M., Maton, P. N., Vinayek, R., Gardner, J. D., & Jensen, R. T. (1989). Secretin and Calcium Provocative Tests in the Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome: A Prospective Study. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-111-9-713

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.