The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial Meningitis: Recent Advances in Pathophysiology and Treatment
Abstract
PURPOSE: To review recent advances in the understanding of pathogenic and pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying bacterial meningitis that may lead to the development of adjunctive strategies for treating this disorder. DATA IDENTIFICATION: Studies published from 1975 to 1989 were identified using Index Medicus and by reviewing the bibliographies of identified articles. STUDY SELECTION: We reviewed the experimental and human studies evaluating pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and antimicrobial treatment of bacterial meningitis, as well as those reviews that have contributed to our understanding of meningitis. DATA EXTRACTION: We evaluated the data on the pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and treatment of bacterial meningitis and considered in depth the information from animal models that may have potentially important applications in the treatment of human disease. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Penicillin and ampicillin remain the drugs of choice for meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis. The third-generation cephalosporins have revolutionized the treatment of gram-negative bacillary meningitis; one such agent, ceftazidime, is also useful for treating Pseudomonas aeruginosa meningitis. Modification of subarachnoid space inflammation by anti-inflammatory agents may lessen many of the pathophysiologic consequences of bacterial meningitis. A recent study of adjunctive dexamethasone therapy in infants and children with bacterial meningitis showed that the incidence of long-term neurologic sequelae was lower in the corticosteroid group. CONCLUSION: Future therapy for bacterial meningitis will use recent developments in the understanding of pathogenic and pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying this disease. Additional studies using monoclonal antibodies against specific virulence factors and investigations into the production of inflammatory cytokines in response to bacterial cell products may lead to additional treatments that decrease the high morbidity and mortality in patients with bacterial meningitis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beachey, E. H. (1981) · Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/143.3.325 · Cited by 1,411
Schlech, W. F. (1985) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1985.03350360075022 · Cited by 2
Cited by
Acute Bacterial Meningitis in Adults -- A Review of 493 Episodes
Durand, M. L., Calderwood, S. B., Weber, D. J., Miller, S. I., Southwick, F. S., Caviness, V. S., & Swartz, M. N. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199301073280104 · Cited by 1,344
Neurobrucellosis: Clinical and Therapeutic Features
McLean, D. R., Russell, N., & Khan, M. Y. (1992) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clind/15.4.582 · Cited by 300
Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of bacterial meningitis
Tunkel, A. R., & Scheld, W. M. (1993) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.6.2.118 · Cited by 279
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tunkel, A. R., Wispelwey, B., & Scheld, W. M.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1990-04-15
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 610-623
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2008937329
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial Meningitis: Recent Advances in Pathophysiology and Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-112-8-610
- The paper
- Tunkel, A. R., Wispelwey, B., & Scheld, W. M. (1990). Bacterial Meningitis: Recent Advances in Pathophysiology and Treatment. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-112-8-610
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.