The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conservative Management of Intermittent Claudication
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence for efficacy of three contemporary treatments for intermittent claudication: pentoxifylline, exercise programs, and smoking cessation. DATA IDENTIFICATION: English-language literature search using MEDLINE, Index Medicus, and bibliographic reviews of major texts and all pertinent articles. STUDY SELECTION: For pentoxifylline, randomized, double-blind controlled trials were selected. For exercise, all controlled trials were selected, because few randomized trials have been done. For smoking cessation, 26 pertinent studies were selected after an exhaustive search. DATA EXTRACTION: Study quality was evaluated; therapeutic efficacy was estimated for pentoxifylline and exercise using meta-analytic techniques. For smoking cessation, all outcomes were determined and described. RESULTS: For pentoxifylline, insufficiently reported data led to marked disparity in effect sizes, preventing a meaningful pooled estimate of effectiveness. The results for exercise therapy suggested that dynamic exercise is beneficial (pooled effect size for pain-free walking distance = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.5; P less than 0.0001). Finally, smoking cessation was associated with a reduced frequency of complications due to progressive disease and improved postoperative graft patency rates. CONCLUSIONS: The limited amount and quality of reported data precluded an overall, reliable estimate of pentoxifylline's efficacy. Structured exercise programs increased pain-free walking distance, and smoking cessation improved postoperative graft patency rates and reduced the complications of peripheral arterial disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial
Chalmers, T. C., Smith, H., Blackburn, B., Silverman, B., Schroeder, B., Reitman, D., & Ambroz, A. (1981) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(81)90056-8 · Cited by 1,349
Cited by
Medical treatment of peripheral arterial disease and claudication
Hiatt, W. R. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105243442108 · Cited by 1,121
Weitz, J. I., Byrne, J., Clagett, G. P., Farkouh, M. E., Porter, J. M., Sackett, D. L., Strandness, D. E., & Taylor, L. M. (1996) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.94.11.3026 · Cited by 889
Intermittent Claudication: A Risk Profile From The Framingham Heart Study
Murabito, J. M., D’Agostino, R. B., Silbershatz, H., & Wilson, P. W. F. (1997) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.96.1.44 · Cited by 696
Dawson, D. L., Cutler, B. S., Meissner, M. H., & Strandness, D. E. (1998) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.98.7.678 · Cited by 502
Tisi, P. V., Hulse, M., Chulakadabba, A., Gosling, P., & Shearman, C. P. (1997) · European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/s1078-5884(97)80283-3 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Radack, K., & Wyderski, R. J.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1990-07-15
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-146
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2029839876
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conservative Management of Intermittent Claudication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-113-2-135
- The paper
- Radack, K., & Wyderski, R. J. (1990). Conservative Management of Intermittent Claudication. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-113-2-135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.