Cited by 257Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareSmoking Behavior and Cessation

The Counseling Practices of Internists

Lewis, Charles E., Clancy, Carolyn, Leake, Barbara, Schwartz, J. Sanford·1991·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Objectives To determine the counseling practices of a group of internists in the areas of smoking, exercise, and alcohol and seat belt use, and to determine the associations among physicians' personal health habits and their counseling practices. Design A random stratified sample of members and fellows of the American College of Physicians in 21 regions selected to represent all areas of the United States. Because of the relatively small proportion of women in this group, they were oversampled. Setting Physicians' practices. Participants One thousand three hundred and forty-nine internists (members or fellows of the College) returned questionnaires, for a response rate of 75%; 52% defined themselves as general internists. Interventions A questionnaire was used to obtain information on internists' use of cigarettes, alcohol, and seat belts and their level of physical activity. Data were obtained on the indications used for counseling and the aggressiveness of counseling about each of these four habits. Measurements and main results Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were used to compare the tendencies of internist subgroups both in using various indications for counseling and in the thoroughness of counseling. Generalists were more likely than specialists to counsel at least once all patients who were at risk and to be more aggressive in counseling. Ninety percent of respondents counseled all of their patients who smoked, but 64.5% never discussed the use of seat belts…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-114-1-54

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physicians who exercise regularly were more likely to promote exercise and provide clearance to all of their patients (46 vs. 14.5%).

    “Consistent with prior research [17], physicians who exercise regularly were more likely to promote exercise and provide clearance to all of their patients (46 vs. 14.5 %) [16].”

    From Pre-exercise screening: role of the primary care physician (2016) · cites this paper as [17]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 257

Authors
Lewis, C. E., Clancy, C., Leake, B., & Schwartz, J. S.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1991-01-01
Volume
114
Issue
1
Pages
54-58
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2086384026
Cited by
257
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
14.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
internists, smoking cessation counseling, physical activity counseling, physical activity, health promotion, physician training, gender differences
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adult, Age Factors, Alcohol Drinking, Counseling, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Internal Medicine, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Sampling Studies, Seat Belts, Sex Factors, United States, Health Behavior, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review