Cited by 13Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Pre-exercise screening: role of the primary care physician

Open access
Joy, Elizabeth A., Pescatello, Linda S.·2016·Israel Journal of Health Policy Research

Abstract

Participation in regular physical activity is associated with a multitude of benefits including a reduction in chronic disease and premature mortality, and improved quality of life. All segments of society need to collaborate with one another in an effort to promote active lives. The Israeli "Gymnasium Law" requires pre-exercise evaluation prior to exercise participation in a health club. Recently that law was modified to allow for participant pre-screening with the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+). This change reflects the evidence that the risk of catastrophic events (e.g. heart attack) during moderate intensity physical activity is low, and the likelihood of detecting heart disease in asymptomatic adults is low. This change will likely reduce the number of individuals who require physician evaluation. The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) recently updated their recommendations for pre-exercise evaluation. The ACSM guidelines have replaced risk factor assessment, with an algorithm that first stratifies based on current physical activity level, then by the presence of chronic disease, and/or signs and symptoms of chronic disease, and last by desired exercise intensity. The goal of these efforts is to reduce barriers to regular physical activity, by eliminating unnecessary medical evaluations. All adults should be encouraged to be physically active.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This commentary argues that pre-exercise screening should not be a barrier to physical activity, highlighting Israel’s Gymnasium Law change allowing PAR-Q+ self-screening and ACSM’s updated algorithm that removes routine CVD risk-factor-based clearance. It concludes that exercise-related cardiac risk is low for most adults and that physicians should use clinical judgment for the remaining pre-exercise certificates.

Key findings

  • Israel’s Gymnasium Law was modified to allow PAR-Q+ self-screening in lieu of physician evaluation; it is estimated that 1% of PAR-Q+ completers will require further physician evaluation, but the authors caution that more than 1% may need clearance given chronic disease prevalence (prediabetes >470 million globally by 2030; high blood pressure in 40% of adults 25 years and older worldwide; nearly 70% of US adults regularly taking at least one prescription medication).
  • The 2014 ACSM expert panel replaced risk-factor assessment with an algorithm based first on current physical activity level, then chronic disease and/or signs and symptoms, and last desired exercise intensity; the new guidelines no longer include a CVD risk factor profile or a low/moderate/high risk classification scheme.
  • In the cited Hoffman et al. survey of 135 Israeli Family Medicine physicians, 63% were aware of guidelines for issuing pre-exercise certificates, 78% provided the certificate after performing and documenting a medical history, and 77% would not issue a certificate to patients with heart disease and would refer to a specialist; physicians who exercised regularly were more likely to promote exercise and provide clearance to all patients (46% vs. 14.5%) and less likely to order a cardiac stress test for cardiac patients.
  • The authors conclude that evidence for pre-exercise screening as a strategy to prevent exercise-related cardiac morbidity and mortality is lacking, that screening may be a barrier and financial burden, and that the risk of sitting on a couch far outweighs the risk of moderate-intensity exercise for the vast majority of adults.

Methods

  • Design: narrative policy/clinical commentary synthesizing Israeli law, ACSM guidelines, and a physician survey; no primary data collection by the authors is described.
  • Described survey (Hoffman et al.): anonymous paper-based questionnaire, convenience sample of Israeli Family Medicine physicians, 135 included in final analysis; constructs included willingness to provide pre-exercise certificates, actions taken before providing a certificate, knowledge of employer recommendations and regulations, and personal weekly exercise.
  • Analysis: narrative synthesis; for the survey, descriptive percentages are reported; no statistical methods or formal systematic search are described in this paper.

Limitations

  • The paper states no limitations.
  • Evident: it is a commentary/narrative synthesis rather than original research or a systematic review.
  • Evident: conclusions rely on cited literature and one convenience-sample survey of Israeli Family Medicine physicians; no formal search strategy, quality appraisal, or primary data are described.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13584-016-0089-0

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

22 of 38 cited sources checked · 15 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    There is limited/conflicting evidence as to the effectiveness of the PPE in identifying conditions that may place largely healthy adolescents and young adults at risk for injury or illness as a result of sport participation.

    “Despite the required nature of this evaluation, there is limited/conflicting evidence as to the effectiveness of the PPE in identifying conditions that may place largely health adolescents and young adults, at risk for injury or illness as a result of sport participation [10].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Hainline B, Drezner JA, Baggish A, Harmon KG, Emery MS, Myerburg RJ, Sanchez E, Molossi S, Parsons JT, Thompson PD. Interassociation Consensus Statement on Cardiovascular Care of College Student-Athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.527 . [Epub ahead of print]. source

      The section on evidence evaluating pre-participation screening for cardiovascular risk says there is limited evidence that screening prevents sports-related death in athletes, and that its cardiovascular history questions have not been scientifically validated (page unavailable). This supports concern about PPE effectiveness for cardiovascular risk, but the paper does not establish the broader claim about identifying conditions that put adolescents and young adults at risk for injury or illness generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premiseown data

    A majority (78%) provided the certificate after performing a medical history and documenting it in the medical record.

    “Likewise, a majority (78 %) provided the certificate after performing a medical history and documenting it in the medical record.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Hoffman RD, Golan R, Vinker S. Dealing with ambiguity: Israeli Physician’s attitudes and practices regarding pre-exercise certificates: a questionnaire study. Israel J Health Policy Res. 2016;5:8. source
  • Premisecitation

    The Israeli Gymnasium Law was recently modified to allow those seeking health club participation to self-complete the PAR-Q+ in lieu of a physician evaluation.

    “Recently the law was modified to allow those seeking health club participation, to self-complete the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+) [13] in lieu of a physician evaluation [14].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [13] Warburton DER, Jamnik VK, Bredin SSD, Gledhill N on behalf of the PAR-Q+ Collaboration. The physical activity readiness questionnaire for everyone (PAR-Q+) and electronic physical activity readiness medical examination (ePARmed-X+). Health Fitness J Canada. 2011;4(2):3–23. source
    • cites [14] Israeli Ministry of Health. Gymnasium Law revision 2015. In: Ministry of Health, editor. Israel (published in Israeli Parliament Notes) page 237.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    The ACSM guidelines have replaced risk factor assessment with an algorithm that first stratifies based on current physical activity level, then by presence of chronic disease, and/or signs and symptoms of chronic disease, and last by desired exercise intensity.

    “The ACSM guidelines have replaced risk factor assessment, with an algorithm that first stratifies based on current physical activity level, then by the presence of chronic disease, and/or signs and symptoms of chronic disease, and last by desired exercise intensity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Riebe D, Franklin B, Thompson PD, Garber CE, Magal M, Whitefiled GP, Magal M, Pescatello LS. Updatng the American college of sports medicine’s recommendations for exercise preparticipation health screening. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:2473–9. source
  • Interpretationcitation

    Given the prevalence of chronic conditions such as prediabetes, high blood pressure, and prescription medication use, it is possible that more than the reported 1% of adults completing the PAR-Q+ will need physician clearance before participation in a health club.

    “When one considers the prevalence of chronic conditions such as prediabetes (an estimated global prevalence of >470 million by 2030) [18], high blood pressure (40 of adults 25 years of age and older worldwide) [19], and the percentage of US adults regularly taking at least one prescription medication (nearly 70 %) [20], it is possible that more than the reported 1 % of adults completing the PAR-Q+”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [18] Tabák AG, Herder C, Rathmann W, Brunner EJ, Kivimäki M. Prediabetes: a high-risk state for developing diabetes. Lancet. 2012;379(9833):2279–90. source
    • cites [19] A global brief on hypertension: Silent killer, global public health crisis. http://ish-world.com/downloads/pdf/global_brief_hypertension.pdf . Accessed 5 Jan 2016.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [20] Zhong W, Maradit-Kremers H, St Sauver JL, Yawn BP, Ebbert JO, Roger VL, Jacobson DJ, McGree ME, Brue SM, Rocca WA. Age and sex patterns of drug prescribing in a defined American population. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88(7):697–707. source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • Rests on an assumption: The prevalence of chronic conditions in adults completing the PAR-Q+ in health clubs is similar to the global or general population prevalence figures cited.
    • Rests on an assumption: A single 'yes' answer on the PAR-Q+ follow-up questions prompts recommendation to seek medical evaluation.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
  • May combine two claims. 8
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Physical inactivity is a global health problem and is vital to the primary prevention of over 35 chronic diseases.

    “Physical inactivity is a global health problem that is vital to the primary prevention of over 35 chronic diseases [1, 2].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] Booth FW, Roberts CK, Laye MJ. Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases. Compr Physiol. 2012;2(2):1143–211. source

      Section 2.11 (page not provided) says physical activity—avoiding or treating inactivity—is primary prevention for 35 chronic diseases or conditions. Section 5.12 (page not provided) describes inactivity affecting billions worldwide, supporting the global framing. The paper specifies 35, not over 35, and attributes the preventive role to physical activity rather than inactivity itself. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [2] Kohl 3rd HW, Craig CL, Lambert EV, et al. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380:294–305. source

      The section “The pandemic of physical inactivity should be a public health priority” describes inactivity as a global problem and links it to preventable deaths from noncommunicable diseases. Our copy does not substantiate the specific claim that physical activity is vital to the primary prevention of over 35 chronic diseases; a search for that number and phrasing found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The ACSM guidelines specifically state that the manner of clearance is left to the discretion of the healthcare provider.

    “The guidelines specifically state that the manner of clearance is left to the discretion of the healthcare provider.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Riebe D, Franklin B, Thompson PD, Garber CE, Magal M, Whitefiled GP, Magal M, Pescatello LS. Updatng the American college of sports medicine’s recommendations for exercise preparticipation health screening. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:2473–9. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The authors concluded that while virtually all physician respondents were willing to issue a pre-exercise certificate to most patients, there was heterogeneity in the pre-exercise evaluation.

    “The authors concluded that while virtually all of the physician respondents were willing to issue a pre-exercise certificate to most patients, there was heterogeneity in the pre-exercise evaluation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Hoffman RD, Golan R, Vinker S. Dealing with ambiguity: Israeli Physician’s attitudes and practices regarding pre-exercise certificates: a questionnaire study. Israel J Health Policy Res. 2016;5:8. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    For the person who does NOT participate in regular exercise, known cardiovascular, metabolic or renal disease, or signs and/or symptoms of disease should prompt medical clearance.

    “For the person For the person who does NOT participate in regular exercise, known cardiovascular, metabolic or renal disease, or signs and/or symptoms of disease should prompt medical clearance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Riebe D, Franklin B, Thompson PD, Garber CE, Magal M, Whitefiled GP, Magal M, Pescatello LS. Updatng the American college of sports medicine’s recommendations for exercise preparticipation health screening. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:2473–9. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The absolute and relative risk of exercise-related cardiac events in a general population of asymptomatic adults is low.

    “Yet, the absolute and relative risk of exercise-related cardiac events in a general population of asymptomatic adults is low [21].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Riebe D, Franklin B, Thompson PD, Garber CE, Magal M, Whitefiled GP, Magal M, Pescatello LS. Updatng the American college of sports medicine’s recommendations for exercise preparticipation health screening. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:2473–9. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The new ACSM guidelines make general recommendations for medical clearance versus recommendation for a specific set of medical exams or tests.

    “The new American College of Sports Medicine guidelines make general recommendations for medical clearance versus recommendation for a specific set of medical exams or tests.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Riebe D, Franklin B, Thompson PD, Garber CE, Magal M, Whitefiled GP, Magal M, Pescatello LS. Updatng the American college of sports medicine’s recommendations for exercise preparticipation health screening. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:2473–9. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    A similar percentage of physicians (77%) would not issue a certificate to patients with heart disease, and would refer to a specialist for further evaluation and clearance.

    “A similar percentage of physicians (77 %) would not issue a certificate to patients with heart disease, and would refer to a specialist for further evaluation and clearance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Hoffman RD, Golan R, Vinker S. Dealing with ambiguity: Israeli Physician’s attitudes and practices regarding pre-exercise certificates: a questionnaire study. Israel J Health Policy Res. 2016;5:8. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Medical clearance would be advised if there was a desire to increase exercise intensity to vigorous.

    “Medical clearance would be advised if there was a desire to increase exercise intensity to vigorous [21].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Riebe D, Franklin B, Thompson PD, Garber CE, Magal M, Whitefiled GP, Magal M, Pescatello LS. Updatng the American college of sports medicine’s recommendations for exercise preparticipation health screening. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:2473–9. source

      The new screening algorithm says that regularly active, asymptomatic people without known cardiovascular, metabolic, or renal disease may gradually increase exercise intensity; it does not advise medical clearance solely because they want to reach vigorous intensity. It advises clearance for people with relevant disease or symptoms, so the citing sentence omits a necessary condition. The indexed passages provide no page number. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The important role of healthcare providers in physical activity assessment and promotion is well established.

    “The important role of healthcare providers in physical activity assessment and promotion is well established [8].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] AuYoung M, Linke SE, Pagoto S, Buman MP, Craft LL, Richardson CR, Hutber A, Marcus BH, Estabrooks P, Gorin SS. Integrating Physical Activity in Primary Care Practice. Am. J. Med. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.02.008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Exercise is an important treatment component for some of the most prevalent, costly, and deadly chronic diseases and health conditions, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, some forms of cancer, obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension.

    “Moreover, exercise is an important treatment component for some of the most prevalent, costly, and deadly chronic diseases and health conditions in the world, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes mellitus, some forms of cancer, obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, among others [3–6].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [3] Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Washington: Department of Health and Human Services; 2008. Available from: http://www.health.gov/paguidelines/pdf/paguide.pdf . Accessed 5 May 2016.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [4] Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Exercise as medicine - evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25 Suppl 3:1–72. source
    • cites [5] Pescatello LS, Riebe D, Arena R. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 9th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
    • cites [6] Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, Nieman DC, Swain DP, American College of sports medicine. American College of sports medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334–59. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    To achieve health benefits, adults are recommended to accumulate 150 min/wk of moderate intensity or 75 min/wk of vigorous intensity physical activity, or a combination, on most, preferably all, days of the week.

    “To achieve these health benefits adults are recommended to accumulate 150 min/wk of moderate intensity or 75 min/wk of vigorous intensity physical activity, or some combination of the two, on most, preferably all, days of the week [6].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, Nieman DC, Swain DP, American College of sports medicine. American College of sports medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334–59. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans recommended that symptomatic persons or those with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or other active chronic conditions who want to begin engaging in vigorous physical activity and who have not already developed a physical activity plan with their health care provider may wish to do so, but does not mandate such medical contact.

    “In support of this recommendation are the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans that recommended that, “symptomatic persons or those with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or other active chronic conditions who want to begin engaging in vigorous physical activity and who have not already developed a physical activity plan with their health care provider may wish to do so”, but does not”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] United States Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. Washington (DC): ODPHP Publications No. U0049 http://www.health.gov/paguidelines/Report/pdf/CommitteeReport.pdf . Accessed 5 Mar 2016.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The goal of these efforts is to reduce barriers to regular physical activity by eliminating unnecessary medical evaluations.

    “The goal of these efforts is to reduce barriers to regular physical activity, by eliminating unnecessary medical evaluations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Pre-exercise screening serves as a potential barrier to adopting regular exercise while placing additional financial burden on individuals and the healthcare system.

    “and at a minimum it serves as a potential barrier to adopting regular exercise while placing additional financial burden on individuals and the healthcare system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Given the global burden of chronic disease, physicians will still find themselves in a position to provide the required pre-exercise certificates.

    “however given the global burden of chronic disease, physicians will still find themselves in a position to provide the required pre-exercise certificates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The new ACSM exercise preparticipation health screening recommendations emphasize the important public health message of regular physical activity for all.

    “The new American College of Sports Medicine exercise preparticipation health screening recommendations emphasize the important public health message of regular physical activity for all.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Use of the PAR-Q+ will surely reduce the number of individuals seeking clearance by a physician.

    “Use of the PAR-Q+ will surely reduce the number of individuals seeking clearance by a physician;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The updated Israeli 'Gymnasium Law' allows for pre-exercise screening with the PAR-Q+, as a strategy to detect conditions that may put health club participants at risk for exercise-related adverse consequences.

    “The updated Israeli “Gymnasium Law” allows for pre-exercise screening with the PAR-Q+, as a strategy to detect conditions that may put health club participants at risk for exercise-related adverse consequences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Exercise is safe for most people, and has many health and fitness benefits.

    “Exercise is safe for most people, and has many health and fitness benefits.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The guidelines recognize that the hazards of exercise-related cardiovascular events are likely to be reduced by careful attention to a safe and effective exercise prescription.

    “The guidelines recognize that the hazards of exercise-related cardiovascular events are likely to be reduced by careful attention to a safe and effective exercise prescription.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
20 of 20
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The prevalence of chronic conditions in adults completing the PAR-Q+ in health clubs is similar to the global or general population prevalence figures cited.

    “When one considers the prevalence of chronic conditions such as prediabetes (an estimated global prevalence of >470 million by 2030) [18], high blood pressure (40 of adults 25 years of age and older worldwide) [19], and the percentage of US adults regularly taking at least one prescription medication (nearly 70 %) [20], it is possible that more than the reported 1 % of adults completing the PAR-Q+”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A single 'yes' answer on the PAR-Q+ follow-up questions prompts recommendation to seek medical evaluation.

    “A single “yes” answer on the PAR-Q+ follow-up questions prompts recommendation to seek medical evaluation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The cardiovascular risk associated with exercise lessens as an individual becomes more physically active and fit.

    “In fact, the cardiovascular risk associated with exercise lessens as an individual becomes more physically active and fit.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The likelihood of detecting heart disease in asymptomatic adults is low.

    “and the likelihood of detecting heart disease in asymptomatic adults is low.”
4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joy, E. A., & Pescatello, L. S.
Affiliations
  • Intermountain Healthcare (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Joy, Elizabeth A.
Venue
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
Published
2016-06-28
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
29-29
ISSN
2045-4015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2472079636
Cited by
13
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Israel Journal of Health Policy Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
physical activity, primary care physician role, Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire, ACSM exercise guidelines, exercise risk assessment, barriers to physical activity, fitness centers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-13.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-13.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review