The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Delayed Access to Health Care: Risk Factors, Reasons, and Consequences
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine characteristics of patients reporting delays in care before hospitalization and the reasons for those delays. DESIGN: Survey; personal interviews. SETTING: Five hospitals in Massachusetts. PATIENTS: Subjects were drawn from a consecutive sample of all adult patients (excluding obstetrics or psychiatry patients) hospitalized during the first 6 months of 1987 as part of a larger study of hospital costs. For the current study, if patients were re-admitted, we included in our analysis only data on the first admission during the study period. We obtained usable survey data from 12,068 of 17,231 eligible patients. RESULTS: Delays in care were reported by 16% of patients. The odds of reporting delays in care among patients who were black, poor, uninsured, or without a regular physician were 40% to 80% greater than those for other patients (P less than 0.01). Most patients who reported delays thought that their problem was not serious (64%). Cost was an important factor in delaying care for patients in lower socioeconomic positions; the odds of delaying care because of cost for patients who were both poor and uninsured were 12 times greater than the odds for other patients (P less than 0.001). After controlling for diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) and severity, patients who reported delays had 9% longer hospital stays compared with others (P less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients generally thought to be disadvantaged are at especially high risk for delaying care for conditions that eventually lead to hospitalization. Because these delays are associated with longer hospital stays and potentially poorer health outcomes, interventions that reduce delays seem especially important.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Can Cultural Competency Reduce Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities? A Review and Conceptual Model
Brach, C., & Fraserirector, I. (2000) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558700057001s09 · Cited by 1,160
Patient-Physician Racial Concordance and the Perceived Quality and Use of Health Care
Saha, S., Komaromy, M., Koepsell, T. D., & Bindman, A. B. (1999) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.159.9.997 · Cited by 1,125
Surveillance and System Avoidance: Criminal Justice Contact and Institutional Attachment
Brayne, S. (2014) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122414530398 · Cited by 538
A three-step floating catchment area method for analyzing spatial access to health services
Wan, N., Zou, B., & Sternberg, T. (2012) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.624987 · Cited by 473
Physician Race and Care of Minority and Medically Indigent Patients
Moy, E. (1995) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520430051038 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Weissman, J. S., Stern, R., Fielding, S. L., & Epstein, A. M.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1991-02-15
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 325-331
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W1966610013
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 45.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delayed Access to Health Care: Risk Factors, Reasons, and Consequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-114-4-325
- The paper
- Weissman, J. S., Stern, R., Fielding, S. L., & Epstein, A. M. (1991). Delayed Access to Health Care: Risk Factors, Reasons, and Consequences. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-114-4-325
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.