The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enterobacter Bacteremia: Clinical Features and Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance during Therapy
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of previously administered antibiotics on the antibiotic susceptibility profile of Enterobacter, the factors affecting mortality, and the emergence of antibiotic resistance during therapy for Enterobacter bacteremia. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study of consecutive patients with Enterobacter bacteremia. SETTING: Three university tertiary care centers, one major university-affiliated hospital, and two university-affiliated Veterans Affairs medical centers. PATIENTS: A total of 129 adult patients were studied. MEASUREMENTS: The two main end points were emergence of resistance during antibiotic therapy and death. MAIN RESULTS: Previous administration of third-generation cephalosporins was more likely to be associated with multiresistant Enterobacter isolates in an initial, positive blood culture (22 of 32, 69%) than was administration of antibiotics that did not include a third-generation cephalosporin (14 of 71, 20%; P less than 0.001). Isolation of multiresistant Enterobacter sp. in the initial blood culture was associated with a higher mortality rate (12 of 37, 32%) than was isolation of a more sensitive Enterobacter sp. (14 of 92, 15%; P = 0.03). Emergence of resistance to third-generation cephalosporin therapy (6 of 31, 19%) occurred more often than did emergence of resistance to aminoglycoside (1 of 89, 0.01%; P = 0.001) or other beta-lactam (0 of 50; P = 0.002) therapy. CONCLUSIONS: More judicious use of third-generation cephalosporins may decrease the incidence of nosocomial multiresistant Enterobacter spp., which in turn may result in a lower mortality for Enterobacter bacteremia. When Enterobacter organisms are isolated from blood, it may be prudent to avoid third-generation cephalosporin therapy regardless of in-vitro susceptibility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The crisis in antibiotic resistance
Neu, H. C. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.257.5073.1064 · Cited by 2,834
Inadequate Antimicrobial Treatment of Infections
Kollef, M. H., Sherman, G., Ward, S., & Fraser, V. J. (1999) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.115.2.462 · Cited by 1,805
Ibrahim, E. H., Sherman, G., Ward, S., Fraser, V. J., & Kollef, M. H. (2000) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.118.1.146 · Cited by 1,779
Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria: Enterobacteriaceae
Paterson, D. L. (2006) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.03.013 · Cited by 874
Combination Therapy for Treatment of Infections with Gram-Negative Bacteria
Tamma, P. D., Cosgrove, S. E., & Maragakis, L. L. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.05041-11 · Cited by 836
Metadata
- Authors
- Chow, J. W., Fine, M. J., Shlaes, D. M., Quinn, J. P., Hooper, D. C., Johnson, M. P., Ramphal, R., Wagener, M. M., Miyashiro, D. K., & Yu, V. L.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1991-10-15
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 585-590
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2041215841
- Cited by
- 889
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enterobacter Bacteremia: Clinical Features and Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance during Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-115-8-585
- The paper
- Chow, J. W., Fine, M. J., Shlaes, D. M., Quinn, J. P., Hooper, D. C., Johnson, M. P., Ramphal, R., Wagener, M. M., Miyashiro, D. K., & Yu, V. L. (1991). Enterobacter Bacteremia: Clinical Features and Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance during Therapy. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-115-8-585
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.