Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Determinants of Gastroesophageal Junction Incompetence: Hiatal Hernia, Lower Esophageal Sphincter, or Both?

Sloan, Sheldon, Rademaker, Alfred W., Kahrilas, Peter J.·1992·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of hiatal hernia and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure on the competence of the gastroesophageal junction under conditions of abrupt increases in intra-abdominal pressure. DESIGN: Acute experiments. SETTING: University-hospital-based gastroenterology practice. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen asymptomatic volunteers and 34 patients with endoscopic findings suggestive of hiatal hernia. INTERVENTION: A series of eight provocative maneuvers entailing abrupt changes in intra-abdominal pressure. MEASUREMENTS: Five radiographic measurements relevant to the presence and extent of hiatal hernia were made from videotaped barium-swallow examinations. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure was measured immediately before each maneuver. The percentage of maneuvers that resulted in gastroesophageal reflux was calculated as the reflux score. A stepwise regression analysis was then used to model the relation between measured variables of the gastroesophageal junction (manometric and radiographic) with reflux score. RESULTS: Patients with hiatal hernia had substantially higher reflux scores and lower LES pressures than either patients without hernias or volunteers. In diminishing order of significance, the terms in the model of susceptibility to reflux were axial length of hernia measured between swallows; LES pressure; and an interaction term in which a progressive increase occurred in the risk for reflux associated with a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter as hernia size increased. CONCLUSIONS: Gastroesophageal junction competence during abrupt increases in intra-abdominal pressure is compromised by both hiatal hernia and low LES pressure. These factors interact with each other to determine susceptibility to reflux.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-117-12-977

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Sloan, S., Rademaker, A. W., & Kahrilas, P. J.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1992-12-15
Volume
117
Issue
12
Pages
977-982
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1973367365
Cited by
276
References
0
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of Gastroesophageal Junction Incompetence: Hiatal Hernia, Lower Esophageal Sphincter, or Both? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-117-12-977
The paper
Sloan, S., Rademaker, A. W., & Kahrilas, P. J. (1992). Determinants of Gastroesophageal Junction Incompetence: Hiatal Hernia, Lower Esophageal Sphincter, or Both? Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-117-12-977

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.