Cited by 113

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prophylaxis against Gallstone Formation with Ursodeoxycholic Acid in Patients Participating in a Very-Low-Calorie Diet Program

Shiffman, Mitchell L., Kaplan, Gordon D., Brinkman-Kaplan, Valerie, Vickers*, Florence F.·1995·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Objective To determine whether prophylactic treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid can prevent gallstone formation in persons participating in a very-low-calorie weight reduction diet program. Design Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multidose clinical trial. Patients were treated with placebo or with 300 mg/d, 600 mg/d, or 1200 mg/d of ursodeoxycholic acid. Setting 31 Health Management Resources weight management centers. Patients 1004 patients were initially enrolled in a 16-week, 520-kcal/d, Health Management Resources liquid protein diet program. All patients had a body mass index of 38 kg/m2 or more and a normal gallbladder ultrasonogram before study entry. Bile analysis was done in 32 patients. Measurements Body weight and body mass index were measured before the diet was started and at 2-week intervals for 16 weeks. Gallbladder ultrasonography was done before enrollment and after 8 and 16 weeks of dieting. Bile was obtained by endoscopy and analyzed for cholesterol crystals and lipid levels. Results Mean body weight for all patients at the start of dieting was 128.2 kg +/- 23.2 kg; mean initial body mass index was 44.2 kg/m2 +/- 6.0 kg/m2. Gallstones developed in 28% (95% CI, 22% to 35%) of patients receiving placebo, in 8% (CI, 5% to 13%) of patients treated with 300 mg/d of ursodeoxycholic acid, in 3% (CI, 1% to 7%) of patients treated with 600 mg/d of ursodeoxycholic acid, and in 2% (CI, 0.5% to 5%) of patients treated with 1200 mg/d of ursodeoxycholic aci…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-122-12-199506150-00002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shiffman, M. L., Kaplan, G. D., Brinkman-Kaplan, V., & Vickers*, F. F.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1995-06-15
Volume
122
Issue
12
Pages
899-905
ISSN
  • 0003-4819
  • 1539-3704
Cited by
113
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review