The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Collaborative Management of Chronic Illness
Abstract
In chronic illness, day-to-day care responsibilities fall most heavily on patients and their families. Effective collaborative relationships with health care providers can help patients and families better handle self-care tasks. Collaborative management is care that strengthens and supports self-care in chronic illness while assuring that effective medical, preventive, and health maintenance interventions take place. In this paper, the following essential elements of collaborative management developed in light of behavioral principles and empirical evidence about effective care in chronic illness are discussed: 1) collaborative definition of problems, in which patient-defined problems are identified along with medical problems diagnosed by physicians; 2) targeting, goal setting, and planning, in which patients and providers focus on a specific problem, set realistic objectives, and develop an action plan for attaining those objectives in the context of patient preferences and readiness; 3) creation of a continuum of self-management training and support services, in which patients have access to services that teach skills needed to carry out medical regimens, guide health behavior changes, and provide emotional support; and 4) active and sustained follow-up, in which patients are contacted at specified intervals to monitor health status, identify potential complications, and check and reinforce progress in implementing the care plan. These elements make up a common core of services for chronic illness care that need not be reinvented for each disease.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is a growing body of evidence that shows supporting people to self-manage their health and care can lead to improvements in clinical and humanistic outcomes [12–18], reducing the economic impact of chronic disease and a means of contributing to the sustainability of the global healthcare system.”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“Similar trends have been found in existing literature in several contexts that self-management is essential to optimizing clinical and humanistic outcomes for patients with chronic conditions [13, 15, 18, 152–155].”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“For effective medical care of chronic illness, such as Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), adequate and sustainable self-management initiated by patients is important [1-3].”
From Long-Term Engagement With a Mobile Self-Management System for People With Type 2 Diabetes (2013) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.
Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322 · Cited by 7,217
Patient Self-management of Chronic Disease in Primary Care
Bodenheimer, T. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.19.2469 · Cited by 3,598
“In both collaborative care and self-management education, the emphasis shifts toward patients as principal caregivers, yet a great responsibility remains with health care professionals who must use their expertise to inform, activate, and assist patients in the self-management of their condition.(5) Patients and profe…”
BackgroundImproving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action
Wagner, E. H., Austin, B. T., Davis, C., Hindmarsh, M., Schaefer, J., & Bonomi, A. (2001) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64 · Cited by 3,446
“This critically important observation confirms our observation based on reviewing earlier literature that chronic disease interventions that positively affect patient well-being necessarily include systematic efforts to increase patients’ knowledge, skills, and confidence to manage their condition.(8) The Cochrane res…”
ResultSelf-citationHibbard, J. H., Stockard, J., Mahoney, E. R., & Tusler, M. (2004) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x · Cited by 2,748
“Collaborating on care and engaging in shared clinical decision making are also linked with better health outcomes (Von Korff et al. 1997; Kaplan, Greenfield, and Ware 1989; Glasgow 2002).”
BackgroundChronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?
Eh, W. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 2,095
Metadata
- Authors
- Von Korff, M., Gruman, J., Schaefer, J., Curry, S. J., & Wagner, E. H.
- Affiliations
- From Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, Washington; and the Center for the Advancement of Health, Washington, D.C.
- Group Health Cooperative (US)
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1997-12-15
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1097-1102
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2048179962
- Cited by
- 1,269
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- chronic disease, collaborative care, patient-provider relationship, self-care, self-management education, goal setting, action planning, patient preferences, follow-up care, health behavior change, emotional support, preventive medicine
- MeSH terms
- Chronic Disease, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Patient Care Planning, Patient Care Team, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Social Support, Health Behavior, Practice Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review