The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Garlic for Treating Hypercholesterolemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of garlic on total cholesterol level in persons with elevated levels by conducting a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Systematic literature searches were conducted on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Cochrane Library, AMED, and CISCOM databases. Manufacturers of commercial garlic preparations and experts in the field were asked about published or unpublished trials. STUDY SELECTION: Selected trials were required to state that they were randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled; use garlic monopreparations; include persons with mean total cholesterol levels of at least 5.17 mmol/L (200 mg/dL); and report total cholesterol level as an end point. There were no language restrictions. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers, blinded to key identifiers of each paper, independently extracted data in a standardized manner and assessed methodologic quality by using the Jadad scale. Discrepancies were settled through discussion. DATA SYNTHESIS: In the 13 trials included in the meta-analysis, garlic reduced total cholesterol level from baseline significantly more than placebo (P < 0.01); the weighted mean difference was -0.41 mmol/L (95% CI, -0.66 to -0.15 mmol/L) (-15.7 mg/dL [CI, -25.6 to -5. 7 mg/dL]). Six diet-controlled trials with the highest scores for methodologic quality revealed a nonsignificant difference between garlic and placebo groups; the weighted mean difference was -0.11 mmol/L (CI, -0.30 to 0.08 mmol/L) (-4.3 mg/dL [CI, -11.7 to 3.1 mg/dL]). CONCLUSIONS: The available data suggest that garlic is superior to placebo in reducing total cholesterol levels. However, the size of the effect is modest, and the robustness of the effect is debatable. The use of garlic for hypercholesterolemia is therefore of questionable value.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 · Cited by 17,582
Schulz (1995) · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520290060030 · Cited by 5,634
Moher, D., Pham, B., Jones, A., Cook, D. J., Jadad, A. R., Moher, M., Tugwell, P., & Klassen, T. P. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)01085-x · Cited by 3,560
Publication bias in clinical research
Easterbrook, P. J., Gopalan, R., Berlin, J. A., & Matthews, D. R. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-y · Cited by 3,109 · cited 1×
“Several forms of publication and location bias exist (53), including the tendency for negative trials to remain unpublished (54), for positive findings to be published in English-language journals (55), and for major medical databases not to index some European journals (56).”
Backgroundmeta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61 · Cited by 1,374
Verschuren, W. M. M. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530020049031 · Cited by 573
Cited by
Bent, S. (2008) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0632-y · Cited by 611
Garlic and cardiovascular disease: A critical review
Rahman, K., & Lowe, G. M. (2006) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/136.3.736s · Cited by 447
The effect of garlic supplements on the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir
Piscitelli, S. C., Burstein, A. H., Welden, N., Gallicano, K. D., & Falloon, J. (2002) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/324351 · Cited by 431
Garlic [Allium sativum]: A review of its potential use as an anti-cancer agent
Thomson, M., & Ali, M. (2003) · Current Cancer Drug Targets · doi:10.2174/1568009033333736 · Cited by 399
Composition, stability, and bioavailability of garlic products used in a clinical trial
Lawson, L. D., & Gardner, C. D. (2005) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf050536+ · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevinson, C., Pittler, M. H., & Ernst, E.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2000-09-19
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 420-429
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2019226150
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 42.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Garlic for Treating Hypercholesterolemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-133-6-200009190-00009
- The paper
- Stevinson, C., Pittler, M. H., & Ernst, E. (2000). Garlic for Treating Hypercholesterolemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-133-6-200009190-00009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.