Cited by 321Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityNeutropenia and Cancer InfectionsFungal Infections and Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intravenous and Oral Itraconazole versus Intravenous Amphotericin B Deoxycholate as Empirical Antifungal Therapy for Persistent Fever in Neutropenic Patients with Cancer Who Are Receiving Broad-Spectrum Antibacterial Therapy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Boogaerts, Marc, Winston, Drew J., Bow, Eric J., Garber, Gary, Reboli, Annette C., Schwarer, Anthony P., Novitzky, Nicolas, Boehme, Angelika, Chwetzoff, Elisabeth, De Beule, Karel, and the Itraconazole Neutropenia Study Group*·2001·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Amphotericin B deoxycholate is currently the standard empirical antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients with cancer who have persistent fever that does not respond to antibiotic therapy. However, this treatment often causes infusion-related and metabolic toxicities, which may be dose limiting. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of itraconazole with those of amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy. DESIGN: An open randomized, controlled, multicenter trial, powered for equivalence. SETTING: 60 oncology centers in 10 countries. PATIENTS: 384 neutropenic patients with cancer who had persistent fever that did not respond to antibiotic therapy. INTERVENTION: Intravenous amphotericin B or intravenous itraconazole followed by oral itraconazole solution. MEASUREMENTS: Defervescence, breakthrough fungal infection, drug-related adverse events, and death. RESULTS: For itraconazole and amphotericin B, the median duration of therapy was 8.5 and 7 days and the median time to defervescence was 7 and 6 days, respectively. The intention-to-treat efficacy analysis of data from 360 patients showed response rates of 47% and 38% for itraconazole and amphotericin B, respectively (difference, 9.0 percentage points [95% CI, -0.8 to 19.5 percentage points]). Fewer drug-related adverse events occurred in the itraconazole group than the amphotericin B group (5% vs. 54% of patients; P = 0.001), and the rate of withdrawal because of toxicity was significantly lower with itraconazole (19% vs. 38%; P = 0.001). Significantly more amphotericin B recipients had nephrotoxicity (P < 0.001). Breakthrough fungal infections (5 patients in each group) and mortality rates (19 deaths in the itraconazole group and 25 deaths in the amphotericin B group) were similar. Sixty-five patients switched to oral itraconazole solution after receiving the intravenous formulation for a median of 9 days. CONCLUSIONS: Itraconazole and amphotericin B have at least equivalent efficacy as empirical antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients with cancer. However, itraconazole is associated with significantly less toxicity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-135-6-200109180-00010

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Marie JP, 1993, Cahiers Oncologiques, 2, 171

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
Boogaerts, M., Winston, D. J., Bow, E. J., Garber, G., Reboli, A. C., Schwarer, A. P., Novitzky, N., Boehme, A., Chwetzoff, E., De Beule, K., & and the Itraconazole Neutropenia Study Group*
Affiliations
  • Janssen (Belgium) (BE)
  • From University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium; University of California, Los Angeles, Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Ottawa Hospital–General Campus, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden, Cooper Hospital, Camden, New Jersey; Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa; University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany;
Corresponding author
Boogaerts, Marc
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2001-09-18
Volume
135
Issue
6
Pages
412-422
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1989277463
Cited by
321
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
FWCI
20.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
itraconazole, amphotericin B deoxycholate, empirical antifungal therapy, persistent fever, neutropenia, cancer patients, breakthrough fungal infection, nephrotoxicity, drug toxicity, defervescence, broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, febrile neutropenia
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Amphotericin B, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Antifungal Agents, Antineoplastic Agents, Deoxycholic Acid, Drug Combinations, Fever, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Mycoses, Neoplasms, Neutropenia, Opportunistic Infections, Risk Factors, Treatment Failure, Itraconazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intravenous and Oral Itraconazole versus Intravenous Amphotericin B Deoxycholate as Empirical Antifungal Therapy for Persistent Fever in Neutropenic Patients with Cancer Who Are Receiving Broad-Spectrum Antibacterial Therapy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-135-6-200109180-00010
The paper
Boogaerts, M., Winston, D. J., Bow, E. J., Garber, G., Reboli, A. C., Schwarer, A. P., Novitzky, N., Boehme, A., Chwetzoff, E., De Beule, K., & and the Itraconazole Neutropenia Study Group*. (2001). Intravenous and Oral Itraconazole versus Intravenous Amphotericin B Deoxycholate as Empirical Antifungal Therapy for Persistent Fever in Neutropenic Patients with Cancer Who Are Receiving Broad-Spectrum Antibacterial Therapy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-135-6-200109180-00010