Cited by 127Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Natural History of Lone Atrial Flutter

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The natural history of atrial flutter is not well defined. OBJECTIVE: To report the risk for stroke, conversion to atrial fibrillation, and anticoagulation for lone atrial flutter. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: A clinically based longitudinal study of inpatients and outpatients with atrial flutter. PATIENTS: The authors compared the stroke rate in 59 patients with atrial flutter with rates in a sample in which age- and sex-specific ischemic cerebrovascular event rates were determined and in a sample of nonhypertensive patients with lone atrial fibrillation. The risk for developing atrial fibrillation after presenting with atrial flutter is also reported. MEASUREMENTS: Electrocardiograms and clinical data were collected and reviewed for each study participant. RESULTS: After adjustment for age and sex, patients with atrial flutter had a higher incidence of thromboembolic events than the sample control patients and patients with atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation developed in 56% of patients with atrial flutter. CONCLUSIONS: Lone atrial flutter has a stroke risk at least as high as lone atrial fibrillation and carries a higher risk for subsequent development of atrial fibrillation than in the general population. Anticoagulation should be considered for all patients with atrial flutter who are older than 65 years of age.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-140-4-200402170-00008

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 127

Metadata

Authors
Halligan, S. C., Gersh, B. J., Brown, R. D., Rosales, A. G., Munger, T. M., Shen, W.-K., Hammill, S. C., & Friedman, P. A.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2004-02-17
Volume
140
Issue
4
Pages
265-268
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2007242746
Cited by
127
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
natural history (disease), stroke risk, thromboembolism, anticoagulation, atrial fibrillation, cerebral ischemic events, elderly patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Thromboembolism, Cohort Studies, Matched-Pair Analysis, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review