Cited by 583Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsAnesthesia and Pain Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Medications for Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline

Chou, Roger, Huffman, Laurie Hoyt·2007·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medications are the most frequently prescribed therapy for low back pain. A challenge in choosing pharmacologic therapy is that each class of medication is associated with a unique balance of risks and benefits. PURPOSE: To assess benefits and harms of acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antidepressants, benzodiazepines, antiepileptic drugs, skeletal muscle relaxants, opioid analgesics, tramadol, and systemic corticosteroids for acute or chronic low back pain (with or without leg pain). DATA SOURCES: English-language studies were identified through searches of MEDLINE (through November 2006) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2006, Issue 4). These electronic searches were supplemented by hand searching reference lists and additional citations suggested by experts. STUDY SELECTION: Systematic reviews and randomized trials of dual therapy or monotherapy with 1 or more of the preceding medications for acute or chronic low back pain that reported pain outcomes, back-specific function, general health status, work disability, or patient satisfaction. DATA EXTRACTION: We abstracted information about study design, population characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and adverse events. To grade methodological quality, we used the Oxman criteria for systematic reviews and the Cochrane Back Review Group criteria for individual trials. DATA SYNTHESIS: We found good evidence that NSAIDs, acetaminophen, skeletal muscle relaxants (for acute low back pain), and tricyclic antidepressants (for chronic low back pain) are effective for pain relief. The magnitude of benefit was moderate (effect size of 0.5 to 0.8, improvement of 10 to 20 points on a 100-point visual analogue pain scale, or relative risk of 1.25 to 2.00 for the proportion of patients experiencing clinically significant pain relief), except in the case of tricyclic antidepressants (for which the benefit was small to moderate). We also found fair evidence that opioids, tramadol, benzodiazepines, and gabapentin (for radiculopathy) are effective for pain relief. We found good evidence that systemic corticosteroids are ineffective. Adverse events, such as sedation, varied by medication, although reliable data on serious and long-term harms are sparse. Most trials were short term (< or =4 weeks). Few data address efficacy of dual-medication therapy compared with monotherapy, or beneficial effects on functional outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Our primary source of data was systematic reviews. We included non-English-language trials only if they were included in English-language systematic reviews. CONCLUSIONS: Medications with good evidence of short-term effectiveness for low back pain are NSAIDs, acetaminophen, skeletal muscle relaxants (for acute low back pain), and tricyclic antidepressants (for chronic low back pain). Evidence is insufficient to identify one medication as offering a clear overall net advantage because of complex tradeoffs between benefits and harms. Individual patients are likely to differ in how they weigh potential benefits, harms, and costs of various medications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00008

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 102 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Bombardier C, 2001, J Rheumatol, 28, 431
  2. Hagen KB, 2004, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD001254
  3. Assendelft WJ, 2004, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD000447
  4. Furlan AD, 2005, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD001351
  5. Turner JA, 1993, J Fam Pract, 37, 545
  6. Brown RL, 1996, J Am Board Fam Pract, 9, 191
  7. Rozenberg S, 1998, Rev Rhum Engl Ed, 65, 649
  8. van Tulder MW, 2000, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD000396
  9. van Tulder MW, 2003, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD004252
  10. Hackett GI, 1988, Practitioner, 232, 163
  11. Hickey RF, 1982, N Z Med J, 95, 312
  12. Towheed TE, 2006, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD004257
  13. Wegman A, 2004, J Rheumatol, 31, 344
  14. Schreiber S, 2001, Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci, 38, 88
  15. Hingorani K, 1966, Ann Phys Med, 12, 125
  16. Moll W, 1973, Med Welt, 24, 1747
  17. Arbus L, 1990, Clinical Trials Journal, 27, 258
  18. Salzmann E, 1992, Journal of Drug Development, 4, 219
  19. Basmajian JV, 1978, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 59, 58
  20. Boyles W, 1983, Today's Therapeutic Trends, 1, 1
  21. Nibbelink DW, 1978, Clinical Therapeutics, 1, 409
  22. Baratta RR, 1976, Curr Ther Res Clin Exp, 20, 233
  23. Metscher B, 2001, Fortschr Med Orig, 118, 147
  24. Müller FO, 1998, Arzneimittelforschung, 48, 675
  25. Schnitzer TJ, 2000, J Rheumatol, 27, 772
  26. Protocol TRP-CAN-1 Study Group, 2004, J Rheumatol, 31, 2454
  27. Relja M, 1990, J Neurol Sci, 98, 334

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 583

Metadata

Authors
Chou, R., & Huffman, L. H.
Affiliations
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2007-10-02
Volume
147
Issue
7
Pages
505-514
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2095995963
Cited by
583
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 43
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
low back pain, chronic low back pain, acute low back pain, pharmacotherapy, paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, tricyclic antidepressants, benzodiazepines, gabapentin, antiepileptic drugs, skeletal muscle relaxants, opioid analgesics, tramadol, systemic corticosteroids, radiculopathy, adverse events, sedation
MeSH terms
Acetaminophen, Acute Disease, Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Analgesics, Opioid, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Anticonvulsants, Antidepressive Agents, Benzodiazepines, Chronic Disease, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Neuromuscular Agents, Low Back Pain, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review