Cited by 173Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adjusted-Dose Warfarin versus Aspirin for Preventing Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Hart, Robert G., Pearce, Lesly A., Aguilar, Maria I.·2007·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Letters16 October 2007Adjusted-Dose Warfarin versus Aspirin for Preventing Stroke in Patients with Atrial FibrillationRobert G. Hart, MD, Lesly A. Pearce, MS, and Maria I. Aguilar, MDRobert G. Hart, MDFrom the University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900; Minot, ND 58703; and Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, AZ 85054., Lesly A. Pearce, MSFrom the University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900; Minot, ND 58703; and Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, AZ 85054., and Maria I. Aguilar, MDFrom the University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900; Minot, ND 58703; and Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, AZ 85054.Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00018 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail TO THE EDITOR:The recently published, randomized Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged (BAFTA) Study compared adjusted-dose warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0) with aspirin (75 mg/d) in 973 patients with atrial fibrillation who were 75 years of age or older (mean age, 81.5 years) and were managed by general practitioners in the United Kingdom (1). The study's important results indicate that the relative efficacy and safety of warfarin for stroke prevention can be extended to very elderly patients who are managed by nonspecialists. Because the BAFTA Study seems likely to be the last large trial comparing ...References1. Mant J, Hobbs FD, Fletcher K, Roalfe A, Fitzmaurice D, Lip GY, et al. Warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in an elderly community population with atrial fibrillation (the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study, BAFTA): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370:493-503. [PMID: 17693178] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:857-67. [PMID: 17577005] LinkGoogle Scholar3. Petersen P, Boysen G, Godtfredsen J, Andersen ED, Andersen B. Placebo-controlled, randomised trial of warfarin and aspirin for prevention of thromboembolic complications in chronic atrial fibrillation. The Copenhagen AFASAK study. Lancet. 1989;1:175-9. [PMID: 2563096] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Petersen P, Boysen G. Prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:482. Google Scholar5. Gulløv AL, Koefoed BG, Petersen P, Pedersen TS, Andersen ED, Godtfredsen J, et al. Fixed minidose warfarin and aspirin alone and in combination vs adjusted-dose warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: Second Copenhagen Atrial Fibrillation, Aspirin, and Anticoagulation Study. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1513-21. [PMID: 9679792] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Study Group. [The randomized study of efficiency and safety of antithrombotic therapy in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: warfarin compared with aspirin]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2006;34:295-8. [PMID: 16776915] MedlineGoogle Scholar7. Secondary prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. EAFT (European Atrial Fibrillation Trial) Study Group. Lancet. 1993;342:1255-62. [PMID: 7901582] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Hellemons BS, Langenberg M, Lodder J, Vermeer F, Schouten HJ, Lemmens T, et al. Primary prevention of arterial thromboembolism in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation in primary care: randomised controlled trial comparing two intensities of coumarin with aspirin. BMJ. 1999;319:958-64. [PMID: 10514159] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Warfarin versus aspirin for prevention of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation II Study. Lancet. 1994;343:687-91. [PMID: 7907677] MedlineGoogle Scholar10. Morocutti C, Amabile G, Fattapposta F, Nicolosi A, Matteoli S, Trappolini M, et al. Indobufen versus warfarin in the secondary prevention of major vascular events in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. SIFA (Studio Italiano Fibrillazione Atriale) Investigators. Stroke. 1997;28:1015-21. [PMID: 9158644] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11. ACTIVE Writing Group on behalf of the ACTIVE Investigators. Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the Atrial fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for prevention of Vascular Events (ACTIVE W): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;367:1903-12. [PMID: 16765759] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. NASPEAF Investigators. Comparative effects of antiplatelet, anticoagulant, or combined therapy in patients with valvular and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a randomized multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1557-66. [PMID: 15489085] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13. Vemmos KN, Tsivgoulis G, Spengos K, Manios E, Xin

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00018

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Petersen P, 1990, N Engl J Med, 323, 482
  2. Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Study Group, 2006, Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi, 34, 295
  3. 1994, Lancet, 343, 687

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Hart, R. G., Pearce, L. A., & Aguilar, M. I.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2007-10-16
Volume
147
Issue
8
Pages
590-592
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2081134280
Cited by
173
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, stroke prevention, aspirin, anticoagulation, elderly patients, general practitioners, international normalized ratio, non-specialist management, antithrombotic therapy, bleeding risk, cost-effectiveness, quality of life
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anticoagulants, Aspirin, Atrial Fibrillation, Fibrinolytic Agents, Humans, Warfarin, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review