The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Review of Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments to Prevent Fractures
Abstract
Letters3 June 2008Review of Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments to Prevent FracturesCatherine MacLean, MD, PhD, Margaret Maglione, MPP, and Marika Suttorp, MSCatherine MacLean, MD, PhDFrom RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 90401.Search for more papers by this author, Margaret Maglione, MPPFrom RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 90401.Search for more papers by this author, and Marika Suttorp, MSFrom RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 90401.Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-11-200806030-00021 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail IN RESPONSE:Dr. Rosen is correct. The study he references (1) was included in our analysis but was not called out in the section on renal insufficiency. This trial reported the effect of risedronate on fractures among participants with varying degrees of renal insufficiency. This study, which combined data from 9 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, reported a reduced incidence of vertebral fractures with risedronate compared with placebo in participants with severe, moderate, and mild renal insufficiency.Although not reported in our paper, we did collect data and calculate pooled estimates for all adverse events reported in all studies reviewed. Details ...References1. Miller PD, Roux C, Boonen S, Barton IP, Dunlap LE, Burgio DE. Safety and efficacy of ris…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Affected trial reports were cited in nine effectiveness reviews and clinical guidelines (one published in Scotland, the others in the USA), for stroke,49 fracture prevention50–55 and fall and injury prevention.56”
From An investigation into the impact and implications of published papers from retracted research: systematic search of affected literature (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“The effectiveness review from the US AHRQ in 2007 on fracture prevention51 (no citation count available) included six affected trial reports in their Table 56,6 8 11–13 15 which are the only trials cited for bisphosphonates preventing fractures in high risk falls patients.”
From An investigation into the impact and implications of published papers from retracted research: systematic search of affected literature (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 10.1359/JBMR.050817 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.AOG.0000137349.79204.b8 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.295.23.joc60074 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3310/hta9220 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Avenell, A., Stewart, F., Grey, A., Gamble, G., & Bolland, M. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031909 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- MacLean, C., Maglione, M., & Suttorp, M.
- Affiliations
- RAND Corporation (US)
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2008-06-03
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 887
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2063985786
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Keywords
- fracture prevention, osteoporosis, comparative effectiveness, risedronate, renal failure, vertebral fractures, bisphosphonates, adverse events, osteopenia, men and women, drug safety, fracture risk assessment tools, patient-centered decision-making, health care costs, health care utilization, quality of life, patient satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments to Prevent Fractures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-148-11-200806030-00021
- The paper
- MacLean, C., Maglione, M., & Suttorp, M. (2008). Review of Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments to Prevent Fractures. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-11-200806030-00021