Cited by 36MRI in cancer diagnosisDigital Radiography and Breast ImagingMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

Identification of Breast Cancer Using Integrated Information from MRI and Mammography

Open access
Yang, Shih-Neng, Li, Fang-Jing, Liao, Yen-Hsiu, Chen, Yueh-Sheng, Shen, Wu-Chung, Huang, Tzung-Chi·2015·PLoS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Integration of information from corresponding regions between the breast MRI and an X-ray mammogram could benefit the detection of breast cancer in clinical diagnosis. We aimed to provide a framework of registration from breast MRI to mammography and to evaluate the diagnosis using the combined information. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 43 patients with 46 lesions underwent both MRI and mammography scans, and the interval between the two examinations was around one month. The distribution of malignant to benign lesions was 31/46 based on histological results. Maximum intensity projection and thin-plate spline methods were applied for image registration for MRI to mammography. The diagnosis using integrated information was evaluated using results of histology as the reference. The assessment of annotations and statistical analysis were performed by the two radiologists. RESULTS: For the cranio-caudal view, the mean post-registration error between MRI and mammography was 2.2±1.9 mm. For the medio-lateral oblique view, the proposed approach performed even better with a mean error of 3.0±2.4 mm. In the diagnosis using MRI assessment with information of mammography, the sensitivity was 91.9±2.3% (29/31, 28/31), specificity 70.0±4.7% (11/15, 10/15), accuracy 84.8±3.1% (40/46, 38/46), positive predictive value 86.4±2.1% (29/33, 28/33) and negative predictive value 80.8±5.4% (11/13, 10/13). CONCLUSION: MRI with the aid of mammography shows potential improvements of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV in clinical breast cancer diagnosis compared to the use of MRI alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0128404

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Tsai YC, Lin HD, Hu YC, Yu CL, Lin KP. Thin-plate spline technique for medical image deformation. Journal of Medical and Biomedical Engineering 2000; 20: 203– 210.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, S.-N., Li, F.-J., Liao, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-S., Shen, W.-C., & Huang, T.-C.
Affiliations
  • China Medical University (TW)
  • China Medical University Hospital (TW)
  • Asia University (TW)
Corresponding author
Huang, Tzung-Chi
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2015-06-09
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
e0128404
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1810199329
Cited by
36
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • China Medical University
  • China Medical University, Taiwan
  • Division of Materials Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
breast cancer diagnosis, breast MRI, mammography, multimodal image registration, maximum intensity projection, breast lesions, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mammography, Middle Aged, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review