Cited by 165Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchChronic Disease Management Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Comorbid Illness and Functional Status on the Expected Benefits of Intensive Glucose Control in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Decision Analysis

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physicians are uncertain about when to pursue intensive glucose control among older patients with diabetes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of comorbid illnesses and functional status, mediated through background mortality, on the expected benefits of intensive glucose control. DESIGN: Decision analysis. DATA SOURCES: Major clinical studies in diabetes and geriatrics. TARGET POPULATION: Patients 60 to 80 years of age who have type 2 diabetes and varied life expectancies estimated from a mortality index that was validated at the population level. TIME HORIZON: Patient lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Health care system. INTERVENTION: Intensive glucose control (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] level of 7.0) versus moderate glucose control (HbA1c level of 7.9). OUTCOME MEASURES: Lifetime differences in incidence of complications and average quality-adjusted days. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Healthy older patients of different age groups had expected benefits of intensive glucose control ranging from 51 to 116 quality-adjusted days. Within each age group, the expected benefits of intensive control steadily declined as the level of comorbid illness and functional impairment increased (mortality index score, 1 to 26 points). For patients 60 to 64 years of age with new-onset diabetes, the benefits declined from 106 days at baseline good health (life expectancy, 14.6 years) to 44 days with 3 additional index points (life expectancy, 9.7 years) and 8 days with 7 additional index points (life expectancy, 4.8 years). A similar decline in benefits occurred among patients with prolonged duration of diabetes. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: With alternative model assumptions (such as Framingham models), expected benefits of intensive control declined as mortality index scores increased. LIMITATIONS: Diabetes clinical trial data were lacking for frail, older patients. The mortality index was not validated for use in predicting individual-level life expectancies. Adverse effects of intensive control were not taken into account. CONCLUSION: Among older diabetic patients, the presence of multiple comorbid illnesses or functional impairments is a more important predictor of limited life expectancy and diminishing expected benefits of intensive glucose control than is age alone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-149-1-200807010-00005

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 10.2337/diacare.28.suppl_1.S4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1001/jama.1997.03540310033031 · DOI
  3. Dasbach EJ, 1992, Med Decis Making, 12, 351
  4. Arias E, 2006, Natl Vital Stat Rep, 54, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–165 of 165

Metadata

Authors
Huang, E. S., Zhang, Q., Gandra, N., Chin, M. H., & Meltzer, D. O.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2008-07-01
Volume
149
Issue
1
Pages
11-19
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2144693872
Cited by
165
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K23AG021963)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P60DK20595, K24DK071933, P60DK020595)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R03HD056073)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, older adults, tight glycemic control, glycemic control, comorbidities, functional status, mortality index, life expectancy, diabetes complications, HbA1c, frailty, decision analysis
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Glucose, Decision Support Techniques, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Life Expectancy, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Sensitivity and Specificity, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review