Cited by 8Diabetes Treatment and ManagementHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHeart Failure Treatment and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Expected Health Benefits of SGLT-2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Older Adults

Open access

Abstract

Background. Older and sicker adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) were underrepresented in randomized trials of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor-agonist (GLP1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2I), and thus, health benefits are uncertain in this population. Objective. To assess the impact of age, health status, and life expectancy in older adults with T2D on health benefits of GLP1RA and SGLT2I. Design. We used the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) model to simulate lifetime health outcomes. We calibrated the UKPDS model to improve mortality prediction in older adults using a common geriatric prognostic index. Participants. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013–2018 participants 65 y and older with T2D, eligible for GLP1RA or SGLT2I according to American Diabetes Association guidelines. Interventions. GLP1RA or SGLT2I use versus no additional medication. Main Measures. Lifetime complications and weighted life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) across overall treatment arms and life expectancies. Key Results. The overall older adult population was predicted to experience significant health benefits from GLP1RA (+0.29 LY [95% confidence interval: 0.27, 0.31], +0.15 QALYs [0.14, 0.16]) and SGLT2I (+0.26 LY [0.24, 0.28], +0.13 QALYs [0.12, 0.14]) as compared with no added medication. However, expected benefits declined in subgroups with shorter life expectancies. Participants with <4 y of life expectancy had minimal gains of <0.05 LY and <0.03 QALYs from added medication. Accounting for injection-related disutility, GLP1RA use reduced QALYs (−0.03 QALYs [−0.04, −0.02]). Conclusions. While GLP1RA and SGLT2I have substantial health benefits for many older adults with type 2 diabetes, benefits are not clinically significant in patients with <4 y of life expectancy. Life expectancy and patient preferences are important considerations when prescribing newer diabetes medications. Highlights: On average, older adults benefit significantly from SGLT2I and GLP1RA use. However, the benefits of these drugs are not clinically significant among older patients with life expectancy less than 4 y. There is potential harm in injectable GLP1RA use in the oldest categories of adults with type 2 diabetes. Heterogeneity in life expectancy and patient preferences for injectable versus oral medications are important to consider when prescribing newer diabetes medications

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/23814683231187566

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GLP-1 receptor agonists have been demonstrated to exert a protective effect on the microvascular compartment of the myocardium.

    “Furthermore, GLP-1 receptor agonists have been demonstrated to exert a protective effect on the microvascular compartment of the myocardium [46,47].”

    From New Developments in Pharmacological Treatment of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes—Beyond and within GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (2024) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says cardiovascular outcome trials found cardiovascular benefits from GLP-1 receptor agonists in selected adults with type 2 diabetes. It does not say those benefits arise from protection of the myocardium’s microvascular compartment; the Results’ microvascular outcomes concern other diabetes complications, not myocardial microvasculature. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Laiteerapong N, Huang ES. Diabetes in older adults. In: Cowie CC, Casagrande SS, Menke A, et al., eds. Diabetes in America. 3rd ed. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US); 2018. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK567980/ [Accessed 27 March, 2021].
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2020
  3. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HAW, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321(7258):405–12. Available from: http://www.bmj.com/content/321/7258/405 [Accessed 3 August, 2018]. · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1161/JAHA.118.011295 · DOI
  5. 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1056/NEJMoa1812389 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR, et al. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet [Internet]. 2019;394(10193):121–30. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673619311493 [Accessed 3 April, 2021].
  8. 10.1056/NEJMoa1612917. · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1056/NEJMoa1509225 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Husain M, Birkenfeld AL, Donsmark M, et al. Oral semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(9):841–51. Available from: https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1901118 [Accessed 3 April, 2021]. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Munshi MN, Meneilly GS, Rodríguez-Mañas L, et al. Diabetes in ageing: pathways for developing the evidence base for clinical guidance. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(10):855–67. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213858720302308 [Accessed 28 March, 2021]. · DOI
  12. Greenfield S, Billimek J, Pellegrini F, et al. Comorbidity affects the relationship between glycemic control and cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(12):854–60. Available from: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00005 [Accessed 28 March, 2021]. · DOI
  13. Patorno E, Pawar A, Bessette LG, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors versus glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in older adults. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(3):826–35. Available from: https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/44/3/826 [Accessed 15 June, 2021] · DOI
  14. 10.1111/dom.14261 · DOI
  15. Lee SJ. Development and validation of a prognostic index for 4-year mortality in older adults. JAMA. 2006;295(7):801. Available from: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.295.7.801 [Accessed 3 March, 2021]. · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1007/s11892-019-1172-z · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0108540 · DOI
  18. Cruz M, Covinsky K, Widera EW, Stijacic-Cenzer I, Lee SJ. Predicting 10-year mortality for older adults. JAMA. 2013;309(9):874. Available from: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.2013.1184 [Accessed 18 March, 2021]. · DOI
  19. Hayes AJ, Leal J, Gray AM, Holman RR, Clarke PM. UKPDS outcomes model 2: a new version of a model to simulate lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using data from the 30 year United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study: UKPDS 82. Diabetologia. 2013;56(9):1925–33. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00125-013-2940-y [Accessed 18 January, 2018]. · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07037-8 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Si L, Willis MS, Asseburg C, et al. Evaluating the ability of economic models of diabetes to simulate new cardiovascular outcomes trials: a report on the ninth Mount Hood diabetes challenge. Value Health. 2020;23(9):1163–70. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301520321124 [Accessed 2 April, 2021]. · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s13300-020-00989-6 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s13300-020-00883-1 · DOI
  24. Guzauskas GF, Rind DM, Fazioli K, Chapman RH, Pearson SD, Hansen RN. Cost-effectiveness of oral semaglutide added to current antihyperglycemic treatment for type 2 diabetes. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021;27(4):455–68. Available from: https://www.jmcp.org/doi/full/10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.4.455 [Accessed 22 April, 2021]. · DOI
  25. Nguyen E, Coleman CI, Nair S, Weeda ER. Cost-utility of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk. J Diabetes Complications. 2018;32(2):210–5. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105687271731259X [Accessed 15 June, 2021]. · DOI
  26. Kuo S, Ye W, Duong J, Herman WH. Are the favorable cardiovascular outcomes of empagliflozin treatment explained by its effects on multiple cardiometabolic risk factors? A simulation of the results of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;141:181–9. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822718300524 [Accessed 14 March, 2021]. · DOI
  27. Alexander JT, 2022, J Gen Intern Med, 37
  28. Alexander JT, 2022, J Gen Intern Med, 37
  29. 10.1056/NEJMoa0806470 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1056/NEJMoa1504347 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190492939.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Cefalu WT, Kaul S, Gerstein HC, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes trials in type 2 diabetes: where do we go from here? Reflections from a diabetes care editors’ expert forum. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(1):14–31. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5741160/ [Accessed 31 December, 2021]. · DOI
  33. 10.1111/dom.12889 · DOI
  34. 10.2337/dc17-1223 · DOI
  35. Nguyen TN, Harris K, Woodward M, et al. The impact of frailty on the effectiveness and safety of intensive glucose control and blood pressure-lowering therapy for people with type 2 diabetes: results from the ADVANCE trial. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(7):1622–9. Available from: https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/early/2021/05/21/dc20-2664 [Accessed 14 June, 2021]. · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1210/jc.2019-00198 · DOI
  37. 10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1443 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dadwani, R. S., Wan, W., Skandari, M. R., & Huang, E. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Dadwani, Rahul S.
Venue
MDM Policy & Practice
Published
2023-07
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
23814683231187566-23814683231187566
ISSN
2381-4683 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384936639
Cited by
8
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MDM Policy & Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Knowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • University of Chicago
Funders
Pritzker School of Medicine
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, older adults, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, life expectancy, quality-adjusted life years, quality of life, patient preferences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review