The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frequency of Inappropriate Medical Exceptions to Quality Measures
Abstract
Background Quality improvement programs that allow physicians to document medical reasons for deviating from guidelines preserve clinicians' judgment while enabling them to strive for high performance. However, physician misconceptions or gaming potentially limit programs. Objective To implement computerized decision support with mechanisms to document medical exceptions to quality measures and to perform peer review of exceptions and provide feedback when appropriate. Design Observational study. Setting Large internal medicine practice. Participants Patients eligible for 1 or more quality measures. Measurements A peer-review panel judged medical exceptions to 16 chronic disease and prevention quality measures as appropriate, inappropriate, or of uncertain appropriateness. Medical records were reviewed after feedback was given to determine whether care changed. Results Physicians recorded 650 standardized medical exceptions during 7 months. The reporting tool was used without any medical reason 36 times (5.5%). Of the remaining 614 exceptions, 93.6% were medically appropriate, 3.1% were inappropriate, and 3.3% were of uncertain appropriateness. Frequencies of inappropriate exceptions were 7 (6.9%) for coronary heart disease, 0 (0%) for heart failure, 10 (10.8%) for diabetes, and 2 (0.6%) for preventive services. After physicians received direct feedback about inappropriate exceptions, 8 of 19 (42%) changed management. The peer-review process took less than 5 minutes per case,…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Alert nonadherence, or clinician overrides, is one key barrier that occurs for 49%–96% of alerts.13–23”
From Clinician collaboration to improve clinical decision support: the Clickbusters initiative (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Ivers, N., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., Young, J. M., Odgaard-Jensen, J., French, S. D., O'Brien, M. A., Johansen, M., Grimshaw, J., & Oxman, A. D. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub3 · Cited by 5,485
Boyd, C. M., Darer, J., Boult, C., Fried, L. P., Boult, L., & Wu, A. W. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.6.716 · Cited by 2,581
National Study of Physician Awareness and Adherence to Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Guidelines
Mosca, L., Linfante, A. H., Benjamin, E. J., Berra, K., Hayes, S. N., Walsh, B. W., Fabunmi, R. P., Kwan, J., Mills, T., & Simpson, S. L. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000154568.43333.82 · Cited by 757
Kiefe, C. I., Allison, J. J., Williams, O. D., Person, S. D., Weaver, M. T., & Weissman, N. W. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.22.2871 · Cited by 503
Tang, P. C., Ralston, M., Arrigotti, M. F., Qureshi, L., & Graham, J. (2007) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2198 · Cited by 193
Stein, E. A., Ballantyne, C. M., Windler, E., Sirnes, P. A., Sussekov, A., Yigit, Z., Seper, C., & Gimpelewicz, C. R. (2008) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.09.099 · Cited by 102
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Jamtvedt G, 2006, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD000259
- 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.294.14.1788 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.295.23.2780 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMsb042458 · DOI
- 10.1001/archinte.166.20.2272 · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-146-4-200702200-00006 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02599049 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.293.10.1239 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.291.20.2466 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMsa055505 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMsa0800310 · DOI
- 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100010054020 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0889-8529(02)00017-8 · DOI
- 10.1002/hep.21848 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.12.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60897-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.06.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02600144 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70006-2 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07105.x · DOI
- 10.1097/01.mlr.0000196960.12860.de · DOI
- Fowles JB, 1995, Health Care Financ Rev, 16, 189
- 10.1177/016327879702000305 · DOI
- 10.1097/00004479-199801000-00004 · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-119-8-199310150-00011 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005650-200411000-00005 · DOI
- 10.1177/1062860606288243 · DOI
- 10.1177/106286069901400607 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00161-9 · DOI
- 10.1093/intqhc/10.5.443 · DOI
- 10.1177/106286060201700204 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vincent, C., & Amalberti, R. (2016) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25559-0 · Cited by 278
A framework for evaluating the appropriateness of clinical decision support alerts and responses
McCoy, A. B., Waitman, L. R., Lewis, J. B., Wright, J. A., Choma, D. P., Miller, R. A., & Peterson, J. F. (2012) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000185 · Cited by 138
Andreozzi, F., Candido, R., Corrao, S., Fornengo, R., Giancaterini, A., Ponzani, P., Ponziani, M. C., Tuccinardi, F., & Mannino, D. (2020) · Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome · doi:10.1186/s13098-020-00559-7 · Cited by 128
Clinician collaboration to improve clinical decision support: the Clickbusters initiative
McCoy, A. B., Russo, E. M., Johnson, K. B., Addison, B., Patel, N., Wanderer, J. P., Mize, D. E., Jackson, J. G., Reese, T. J., Littlejohn, S., et al. (2022) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac027 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Persell, S. D., Dolan, N. C., Friesema, E. M., Thompson, J. A., Kaiser, D., & Baker, D. W.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2010-02-16
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 225-231
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2052196077
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 17.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1k08hs015647-01, 1R18HS17163-01)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Keywords
- quality metrics, decision support system, peer review, preventive services, coronary artery disease, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, clinical feedback, internal medicine practice
- MeSH terms
- Feedback, Humans, Illinois, Medical Audit, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Peer Review, Health Care, Observation, Guideline Adherence, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
