Cited by 126Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementReproductive tract infections research

Test performance and acceptability of self- versus provider-collected swabs for high-risk HPV DNA testing in female-to-male trans masculine patients.

Open access
Reisner, Sari L., Deutsch, Madeline B., Peitzmeier, Sarah M., White Hughto, Jaclyn M., Cavanaugh, Timothy P., Pardee, Dana J., McLean, Sarah A., Panther, Lori A. +3 more·2018·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) causes virtually all cervical cancers. Trans masculine (TM) people (those assigned female at birth who identify with a gender other than female) have low uptake of conventional cervical cancer screening. Self-collected hrHPV DNA testing has high levels of acceptability among cisgender (non-transgender) females and may support increased cervical cancer screening uptake in TM individuals. OBJECTIVE: To assess the test performance and acceptability of self-collected vaginal specimens in comparison to provider-collected cervical swabs for hrHPV DNA detection in TM individuals ages 21-64 years. METHODS: Between March 2015-September 2016, 150 TM participants with a cervix (mean age = 27.5 years; SD = 5.7) completed a one-time study visit comprised of a self-report survey, self-collected vaginal HPV DNA swab, clinician-administered cervical HPV swab, and brief interview on acceptability of clinical procedures. Participants were randomized to complete either self- or provider-collection first to minimize ordering effects. Self- and provider-collected samples were tested for 13 hrHPV DNA types using a DNA Hybridization Assay. The primary outcome variable was the concordance (kappa statistic) and performance (sensitivity, specificity) of self-collected vaginal HPV DNA specimens versus provider-collected cervical HPV swabs as the gold standard. RESULTS: Of the 131 participants completing both the self- and provider-collected HPV tests, 21 cases of hrHPV were detected by the provider cervical swab (gold standard; 16.0% hrHPV prevalence); 15 of these cases were accurately detected by the self-collected vaginal swab (71.4% concordance) (Kappa = 0.75, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.59, 0.92; p<0.001). Compared to the provider-collected cervical hrHPV DNA sample (gold standard), the self-collected vaginal hrHPV DNA test demonstrated a sensitivity of 71.4% (95% CI: 0.52, 0.91; p = 0.0495) and specificity of 98.2% (95% CI: 0.96, 1.00; p<0.0001). Over 90% of participants endorsed a preference for the self-collected vaginal swab over provider-collected cervical swab. CONCLUSION: Self-collected vaginal swabs are highly acceptable to TM as a means to test for hrHPV DNA. Test performance of this self-collection method for hrHPV detection in TM is consistent with previous studies in cisgender females. Self-collected vaginal swab testing for hrHPV DNA represents a reasonable and patient-centered strategy for primary cervical cancer screening in TM patients unwilling to undergo provider collection of specimens via speculum exam.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0190172

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-collected swabs for high-risk HPV testing has been reported to be an acceptable option for transgender men.

    “self-collected swabs for high-risk HPV testing has been reported to be an acceptable option for transgender men (371).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [371]

  • Some transmale participants cited feelings of gender dysphoria and difficulty positioning the body or swab for self-sampling as challenges of self-sampling.

    “Some participants cited feelings of gender dysphoria and difficulty positioning the body or swab for self-sampling as challenges of self-sampling.”
  • Among transmales who had undergone both self-sampling and clinician sampling for HPV DNA, 90% expressed a preference for self-sampling.

    “Among transmales who had undergone both self-sampling and clinician sampling for HPV DNA, 90% expressed a preference for self-sampling citing privacy, ease and self-empowerment as reasons for their preference.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reisner, S. L., Deutsch, M. B., Peitzmeier, S. M., White Hughto, J. M., Cavanaugh, T. P., Pardee, D. J., McLean, S. A., Panther, L. A., Gelman, M., Mimiaga, M. J., & Potter, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Fenway Health (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Reisner, Sari L.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2018-03-14
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
e0190172
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791333130
Cited by
126
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11
FWCI
7.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (CER-1403-12625)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
high-risk HPV, HPV testing, self-collected vaginal swabs, cervical cancer screening, test performance, acceptability, concordance, sensitivity and specificity, DNA hybridization assay, gender-affirming hormone therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, DNA, Viral, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Self Care, Sensitivity and Specificity, Transsexualism, Vaginal Smears, Prevalence, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Early Detection of Cancer, Young Adult, Transgender Persons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review