Cited by 408Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectChild Abuse and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Screening for intimate partner violence and abuse of elderly and vulnerable adults: u. S. preventive services task force recommendation statement

Moyer, Virginia A., on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*·2013·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

DESCRIPTION: Update of the 2004 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation statement on screening for family and intimate partner violence (IPV). METHODS: The USPSTF commissioned a systematic evidence review on screening women for IPV and elderly and vulnerable adults for abuse and neglect. This review examined the accuracy of screening tools for identifying IPV and the benefits and harms of screening women of childbearing age and elderly and vulnerable adults. POPULATION: These recommendations apply to asymptomatic women (women who do not have signs or symptoms of abuse) of reproductive age and elderly and vulnerable adults. RECOMMENDATION: The USPSTF recommends that clinicians screen women of childbearing age for IPV, such as domestic violence, and provide or refer women who screen positive to intervention services (B recommendation).The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening all elderly or vulnerable adults (physically or mentally dysfunctional) for abuse and neglect (I statement).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-158-6-201303190-00588

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2008, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 57, 113
  2. 10.1016/S0193-953X(05)70317-8 · DOI
  3. Paranjape A, 2006, J Natl Med Assoc, 98, 1663

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 408

Metadata

Authors
Moyer, V. A., & on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*
Affiliations
United States Preventive Services Task Force (US)
Corresponding author
Moyer, Virginia A.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2013-03-19
Volume
158
Issue
6
Pages
478-486
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2109966728
Cited by
408
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 25
FWCI
68.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
intimate partner violence, domestic violence, elder abuse, abuse and neglect, vulnerable adults, screening, women of reproductive age, intervention services
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Elder Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Sexual Partners, United States, Domestic Violence, Risk Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review