The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of Cardiac Function
Abstract
In the past, assessment of cardiac function has centered on techniques that examined the heart's action as a pump. Hemodynamic analysis of cardiac function within the framework of the Frank-Starling relation is valuable when directional changes in the performance under stress of the diseased ventricle are compared with the normal. Recently, principles of skeletal muscle physiology have been extended to the myocardium and applied successfully to examination of the function of the intact heart. Angiography in patients revealed that specific alterations in the pattern of contraction occur in patients with left ventricular disease, principally a decrease in extent and velocity of fiber shortening, associated with decrease in the extent of reduction of ventricular wall tension during contraction. Estimates of contractile state based on the tension-velocity-length relation determined angiographically sensitively quantify the myocardial contractile state in patients, even during abnormal ventricular loading. A second useful method for assessment of cardiac function in patients consists of relating the first derivative of the ventricular pressure to the simultaneously occurring isovolumic pressure. A third promising method measures pulmonary arterial and aortic blood flow velocity by a cathetertip velocity probe. This instrument uses the principle of the external electromagnetic flow meter; its potential applicability to assessment of myocardial function has been shown. Use of the cardiac output response to exercise in the assessment of cardiac function is reviewed. Measurement of the cardiac output when exercise has lowered the mixed venous oxygen saturation to 30% is useful, reliably and sensitively distinguishing performance of the patient with mild or moderate impairment of cardiac function from normal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Pathogenesis of Acute Pulmonary Edema Associated with Hypertension
Gandhi, S. K., Powers, J. C., Nomeir, A.-M., Fowle, K., Kitzman, D. W., Rankin, K. M., & Little, W. C. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200101043440103 · Cited by 733
Cardiac Atrophy After Bed-Rest Deconditioning: A Nonneural Mechanism for Orthostatic Intolerance
Levine, B. D., Zuckerman, J. H., & Pawelczyk, J. A. (1997) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.96.2.517 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- BRAUNWALD, E., ROSS, J., GAULT, J. H., MASON, D. T., MILLS, C., GABE, I. T., & EPSTEIN, S. E.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1969-02-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 369-400
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2020303123
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Cardiac Function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-70-2-369
- The paper
- BRAUNWALD, E., ROSS, J., GAULT, J. H., MASON, D. T., MILLS, C., GABE, I. T., & EPSTEIN, S. E. (1969). Assessment of Cardiac Function. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-70-2-369
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.