Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Assessment of Cardiac Function

BRAUNWALD, EUGENE, ROSS, JOHN, GAULT, JAMES H., MASON, DEAN T., MILLS, CHRISTOPHER, GABE, IVOR T., EPSTEIN, STEPHEN E.·1969·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

In the past, assessment of cardiac function has centered on techniques that examined the heart's action as a pump. Hemodynamic analysis of cardiac function within the framework of the Frank-Starling relation is valuable when directional changes in the performance under stress of the diseased ventricle are compared with the normal. Recently, principles of skeletal muscle physiology have been extended to the myocardium and applied successfully to examination of the function of the intact heart. Angiography in patients revealed that specific alterations in the pattern of contraction occur in patients with left ventricular disease, principally a decrease in extent and velocity of fiber shortening, associated with decrease in the extent of reduction of ventricular wall tension during contraction. Estimates of contractile state based on the tension-velocity-length relation determined angiographically sensitively quantify the myocardial contractile state in patients, even during abnormal ventricular loading. A second useful method for assessment of cardiac function in patients consists of relating the first derivative of the ventricular pressure to the simultaneously occurring isovolumic pressure. A third promising method measures pulmonary arterial and aortic blood flow velocity by a cathetertip velocity probe. This instrument uses the principle of the external electromagnetic flow meter; its potential applicability to assessment of myocardial function has been shown. Use of the cardiac output response to exercise in the assessment of cardiac function is reviewed. Measurement of the cardiac output when exercise has lowered the mixed venous oxygen saturation to 30% is useful, reliably and sensitively distinguishing performance of the patient with mild or moderate impairment of cardiac function from normal.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-70-2-369

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
BRAUNWALD, E., ROSS, J., GAULT, J. H., MASON, D. T., MILLS, C., GABE, I. T., & EPSTEIN, S. E.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1969-02-01
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
369-400
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2020303123
Cited by
172
References
0
FWCI
12.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Cardiac Function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-70-2-369
The paper
BRAUNWALD, E., ROSS, J., GAULT, J. H., MASON, D. T., MILLS, C., GABE, I. T., & EPSTEIN, S. E. (1969). Assessment of Cardiac Function. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-70-2-369

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.