Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 733

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Pathogenesis of Acute Pulmonary Edema Associated with Hypertension

Open access
Gandhi, Sanjay K., Powers, John C., Nomeir, Abdel-Mohsen, Fowle, Karen, Kitzman, Dalane W., Rankin, Kevin M., Little, William C.·2001·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute pulmonary edema often have marked hypertension but, after reduction of the blood pressure, have a normal left ventricular ejection fraction (> or =0.50). However, the pulmonary edema may not have resulted from isolated diastolic dysfunction but, instead, may be due to transient systolic dysfunction, acute mitral regurgitation, or both. METHODS: We studied 38 patients (14 men and 24 women; mean [+/-SD] age, 67+/-13 years) with acute pulmonary edema and systolic blood pressure greater than 160 mm Hg. We evaluated the ejection fraction and regional function by two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography, both during the acute episode and one to three days after treatment. RESULTS: The mean systolic blood pressure was 200+/-26 mm Hg during the initial echocardiographic examination and was reduced to 139+/-17 mm Hg (P< 0.01) at the time of the follow-up examination. Despite the marked difference in blood pressure, the ejection fraction was similar during the acute episode (0.50+/-0.15) and after treatment (0.50+/-0.13). The left ventricular regional wall-motion index (the mean value for 16 segments) was also the same during the acute episode (1.6+/-0.6) and after treatment (1.6+/-0.6). No patient had severe mitral regurgitation during the acute episode. Eighteen patients had a normal ejection fraction (at least 0.50) after treatment. In 16 of these 18 patients, the ejection fraction was at least 0.50 during the acute episode. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with hypertensive pulmonary edema, a normal ejection fraction after treatment suggests that the edema was due to the exacerbation of diastolic dysfunction by hypertension--not to transient systolic dysfunction or mitral regurgitation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200101043440103

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 733

Metadata

Authors
Gandhi, S. K., Powers, J. C., Nomeir, A.-M., Fowle, K., Kitzman, D. W., Rankin, K. M., & Little, W. C.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2001-01-04
Volume
344
Issue
1
Pages
17-22
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2323050154
Cited by
733
References
14
FWCI
29.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Pathogenesis of Acute Pulmonary Edema Associated with Hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200101043440103
The paper
Gandhi, S. K., Powers, J. C., Nomeir, A.-M., Fowle, K., Kitzman, D. W., Rankin, K. M., & Little, W. C. (2001). The Pathogenesis of Acute Pulmonary Edema Associated with Hypertension. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200101043440103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.