Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 522

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trends in long‐term opioid therapy for chronic non‐cancer pain

Open access
Boudreau, Denise, Von Korff, Michael, Rutter, Carolyn M., Saunders, Kathleen, Ray, G. Thomas, Sullivan, Mark D., Campbell, Cynthia I., Merrill, Joseph O., Silverberg, Michael J., Banta‐Green, Caleb, Weisner, Constance·2009·Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

Abstract

Objective: To report trends and characteristics of long‐term opioid use for non‐cancer pain. Methods: CONSORT (CONsortium to Study Opioid Risks and Trends) includes adult enrollees of two health plans serving over 1 per cent of the US population. Using automated data, we constructed episodes of opioid use between 1997 and 2005. We estimated age–sex standardized rates of opioid use episodes beginning in each year (incident) and on‐going in each year (prevalent), and the per cent change in rates annualized (PCA) over the 9‐year period. Long‐term episodes were defined as > 90 days with 120+ days supply or 10+ opioid prescriptions in a given year. Results: Over the study period, incident long‐term use increased from 8.5 to 12.1 per 1000 at Group Health (GH) (6.0% PCA), and 6.3 to 8.6 per 1000 at Kaiser Permanente of Northern California (KPNC) (5.5% PCA). Prevalent long‐term use doubled from 23.9 to 46.8 per 1000 at GH (8.5% PCA), and 21.5 to 39.2 per 1000 at KPNC (8.1% PCA). Non‐Schedule II opioids were the most commonly used opioid among patients engaged in long‐term opioid therapy, particularly at KPNC. Long‐term use of Schedule II opioids also increased substantially at both health plans. Among prevalent long‐term users in 2005, 28.6% at GH and 30.2% at KPNC were also regular users of sedative hypnotics. Conclusion: Long‐term opioid therapy for non‐cancer pain is increasingly prevalent, but the benefits and risks associated with such therapy are inadequately understood. Concurrent use of opioids and sedative‐hypnotics was unexpectedly common and deserves further study. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pds.1833

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 522

Metadata

Authors
Boudreau, D., Von Korff, M., Rutter, C. M., Saunders, K., Ray, G. T., Sullivan, M. D., Campbell, C. I., Merrill, J. O., Silverberg, M. J., Banta‐Green, C., & Weisner, C.
Venue
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-08-28
Volume
18
Issue
12
Pages
1166-1175
ISSN
  • 1053-8569 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1557
OpenAlex
W2056370494
Cited by
522
References
44
FWCI
20.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in long‐term opioid therapy for chronic non‐cancer pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pds.1833
The paper
Boudreau, D., Von Korff, M., Rutter, C. M., Saunders, K., Ray, G. T., Sullivan, M. D., Campbell, C. I., Merrill, J. O., Silverberg, M. J., Banta‐Green, C., & Weisner, C. (2009). Trends in long‐term opioid therapy for chronic non‐cancer pain. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1833

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.