Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 847

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Medical Mycology. The Pathogenic Fungi and Pathogenic Actinomycetes.

·1976·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Excerpt Fungi are assuming an ever important role as the cause of human disease. This new text on medical mycology fills a definite need in this area of medicine. Dr. Rippon, an expert medical mycologist, has recognized the new areas of opportunistic fungal infections and covers them well in this book, but he also discusses the old and established fungal infections with excellent clarity. The fascinating historical background of the major fungal diseases is presented in greater detail than in any previous textbook. The changing nomenclature of the fungi and the diseases they cause has been given careful thought and logical...

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-84-4-514_1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 847

Metadata

Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1976-04-01
Volume
84
Issue
4
Pages
514-514
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1514377888
Cited by
847
References
0
FWCI
17.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical Mycology. The Pathogenic Fungi and Pathogenic Actinomycetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-84-4-514_1
The paper
Medical Mycology. The Pathogenic Fungi and Pathogenic Actinomycetes. (1976). Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-84-4-514_1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.