The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improved Outcomes in Hypertension After Physician Tutorials: A Controlled Trial
Abstract
Physicians working at the General Medical Clinic of the Johns Hopkins Hospital entered into tutorials to improve their effectiveness as managers and educators of patients with essential hypertension. After exposure to a single teaching session, tutored physicians allocated a greater percent of clinic-visit time to patient teaching than did control physicians, achieving increased patient knowledge and more appropriate patient beliefs regarding hypertension and its therapy. Patients of tutored physicians were more compliant with drug regimens and had better control of blood pressure than patients of untutored physicians. The personal physician, if he is provided with strategies for identifying the noncompliant patient and for intervening in that behavior, can apply a stimulus to his patients that results in improved compliance and better control of hypertension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Health Belief Model: a decade later.
Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019818401100101 · Cited by 8,437
Organizing Care for Patients with Chronic Illness
Wagner, E. H., Austin, B. T., & Korff, M. V. (1996) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3350391 · Cited by 2,877
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations
Dwamena, F., Holmes-Rovner, M., Gaulden, C. M., Jorgenson, S., Sadigh, G., Sikorskii, A., Lewin, S., Smith, R. C., Coffey, J., Olomu, A., et al. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003267.pub2 · Cited by 1,227
Adherence in Hypertension: A Review of Prevalence, Risk Factors, Impact, and Management
Burnier, M., & Egan, B. M. (2019) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.118.313220 · Cited by 878
Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension
Glynn, L. G., Murphy, A. W., Smith, S. M., Schroeder, K., & Fahey, T. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005182.pub4 · Cited by 668
Metadata
- Authors
- INUI, T. S., YOURTEE, E. L., & WILLIAMSON, J. W.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1976-06-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 646-651
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2022977824
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Outcomes in Hypertension After Physician Tutorials: A Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-84-6-646
- The paper
- INUI, T. S., YOURTEE, E. L., & WILLIAMSON, J. W. (1976). Improved Outcomes in Hypertension After Physician Tutorials: A Controlled Trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-84-6-646
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.