The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low-Dose Aspirin for Prevention of Morbidity and Mortality From Preeclampsia: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. PURPOSE: To systematically review benefits and harms of low-dose aspirin for preventing morbidity and mortality from preeclampsia. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (January 2006 to June 2013); previous systematic reviews, clinical trial registries, and surveillance searches for large studies (June 2013 to February 2014). STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) to assess benefits among women at high preeclampsia risk and RCTs or large cohort studies of harms among women at any risk level. English-language studies of fair or good quality were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Dual quality assessment and abstraction of studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: Two large, multisite RCTs and 13 smaller RCTs of high-risk women (8 good-quality) were included, in addition to 6 RCTs and 2 observational studies of average-risk women to assess harms (7 good-quality). Depending on baseline risk, aspirin use was associated with absolute risk reductions of 2% to 5% for preeclampsia (relative risk [RR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.95]), 1% to 5% for intrauterine growth restriction (RR, 0.80 [CI, 0.65 to 0.99]), and 2% to 4% for preterm birth (RR, 0.86 [CI, 0.76 to 0.98]). No significant perinatal or maternal harms were identified, but rare harms could not be ruled out. Evidence on long-term outcomes was sparse, but 18-month follow-up from the largest trial found no developmental harms. LIMITATIONS: Benefits may have been overestimated due to small-study effects. Predictive intervals were not statistically significant. Future studies could shift findings toward the null. CONCLUSION: Daily low-dose aspirin beginning as early as the second trimester prevented clinically important health outcomes. No harms were identified, but long-term evidence was limited.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 17,633
Steegers, E. A., von Dadelszen, P., Duvekot, J. J., & Pijnenborg, R. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60279-6 · Cited by 2,850
An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood
Saigal, S., & Doyle, L. W. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60136-1 · Cited by 2,818
Bellamy, L., Casas, J.-P., Hingorani, A. D., & Williams, D. J. (2007) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39335.385301.be · Cited by 2,552
Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis
Sterne, J. A. C., Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7304.101 · Cited by 2,225
Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies
Duckitt, K., & Harrington, D. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38380.674340.e0 · Cited by 1,784
Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants
McIntire, D. D., Bloom, S. L., Casey, B. M., & Leveno, K. J. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199904223401603 · Cited by 1,258
Bujold, E., Roberge, S., Lacasse, Y., Bureau, M., Audibert, F., Marcoux, S., Forest, J.-C., & Giguère, Y. (2010) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181e9322a · Cited by 1,092
Cited by
Bartsch, E., Medcalf, K. E., Park, A. L., & Ray, J. G. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i1753 · Cited by 996
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 743: Low-Dose Aspirin Use During Pregnancy
(2018) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002708 · Cited by 711
Roberge, S., Nicolaides, K., Demers, S., Hyett, J., Chaillet, N., & Bujold, E. (2017) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.076 · Cited by 679
15. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc22-s015 · Cited by 504
Hoffman, M. K., Goudar, S. S., Kodkany, B. S., Metgud, M., Somannavar, M., Okitawutshu, J., Lokangaka, A., Tshefu, A., Bose, C. L., Mwapule, A., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32973-3 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Henderson, J. T., Whitlock, E. P., O’Connor, E., Senger, C. A., Thompson, J. H., & Rowland, M. G.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2014-05-20
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 695-703
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2155711836
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 61.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low-Dose Aspirin for Prevention of Morbidity and Mortality From Preeclampsia: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/m13-2844
- The paper
- Henderson, J. T., Whitlock, E. P., O’Connor, E., Senger, C. A., Thompson, J. H., & Rowland, M. G. (2014). Low-Dose Aspirin for Prevention of Morbidity and Mortality From Preeclampsia: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/m13-2844
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.