Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Blood Pressure Reduction in Mild Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Sundström, Johan, Arima, Hisatomi, Jackson, Rod, Turnbull, Fiona, Rahimi, Kazem, Chalmers, John, Woodward, Mark, Neal, Bruce, on behalf of the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration*·2015·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effects of blood pressure reduction in persons with grade 1 hypertension are unclear. PURPOSE: To investigate whether pharmacologic blood pressure reduction prevents cardiovascular events and deaths in persons with grade 1 hypertension. DATA SOURCES: Trials included in the BPLTTC (Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration) and trials identified from a previous review and electronic database searches. STUDY SELECTION: Patients without cardiovascular disease with blood pressures in the grade 1 hypertension range (140 to 159/90 to 99 mm Hg) who were randomly assigned to an active (antihypertensive drug or more intensive regimen) or control (placebo or less intensive regimen) blood pressure-lowering regimen. DATA EXTRACTION: Individual-patient data from BPLTTC trials and aggregate data from other trials were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed for all trials. DATA SYNTHESIS: Individual-patient data involved 10 comparisons from trials where most patients had diabetes, and aggregate data involved 3 comparisons from trials of patients without diabetes. The average blood pressure reduction was about 3.6/2.4 mm Hg. Over 5 years, odds ratios were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.01) for total cardiovascular events, 0.72 (CI, 0.55 to 0.94) for strokes, 0.91 (CI, 0.74 to 1.12) for coronary events, 0.80 (CI, 0.57 to 1.12) for heart failure, 0.75 (CI, 0.57 to 0.98) for cardiovascular deaths, and 0.78 (CI, 0.67 to 0.92) for total deaths. Results were similar in secondary analyses. Withdrawal from treatment due to adverse effects was more common in the active groups. LIMITATION: Blood pressure reductions and numbers of events were small. CONCLUSION: Blood pressure-lowering therapy is likely to prevent stroke and death in patients with uncomplicated grade 1 hypertension. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, Swedish Research Council, Australian Research Council, and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m14-0773

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
Sundström, J., Arima, H., Jackson, R., Turnbull, F., Rahimi, K., Chalmers, J., Woodward, M., Neal, B., & on behalf of the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration*
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2015-02-03
Volume
162
Issue
3
Pages
184-191
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2165927787
Cited by
262
References
4
FWCI
16.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Blood Pressure Reduction in Mild Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/m14-0773
The paper
Sundström, J., Arima, H., Jackson, R., Turnbull, F., Rahimi, K., Chalmers, J., Woodward, M., Neal, B., & on behalf of the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration*. (2015). Effects of Blood Pressure Reduction in Mild Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/m14-0773

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.