Cited by 101Hepatitis C virus researchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePharmaceutical Economics and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir-based regimens for treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 2 or 3 infection.

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 or 3 can be treated with sofosbuvir without interferon. Because sofosbuvir is costly, its benefits should be compared with the additional resources used. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir-based treatments for HCV genotype 2 or 3 infection in the United States. DESIGN: Monte Carlo simulation, including deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. DATA SOURCES: Randomized trials, observational cohorts, and national health care spending surveys. TARGET POPULATION: 8 patient types defined by HCV genotype (2 vs. 3), treatment history (naive vs. experienced), and cirrhosis status (noncirrhotic vs. cirrhotic). TIME HORIZON: Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Payer. INTERVENTION: Sofosbuvir-based therapies, pegylated interferon-ribavirin, and no therapy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: The ICER of sofosbuvir-based treatment was less than $100,000 per QALY in cirrhotic patients (genotype 2 or 3 and treatment-naive or treatment-experienced) and in treatment-experienced noncirrhotic patients but was greater than $200,000 per QALY in treatment-naive noncirrhotic patients. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: The ICER of sofosbuvir-based therapy for treatment-naive noncirrhotic patients with genotype 2 or 3 infection was less than $100,000 per QALY when the cost of sofosbuvir was reduced by approximately 40% and 60%, respectively. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, cost-effectiveness conclusions were robust to uncertainty in treatment efficacy. LIMITATION: The analysis did not consider possible benefits of preventing HCV transmission. CONCLUSION: Sofosbuvir provides good value for money for treatment-experienced patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 infection and those with cirrhosis. At their current cost, sofosbuvir-based regimens for treatment-naive noncirrhotic patients exceed willingness-to-pay thresholds commonly cited in the United States. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Drug Abuse and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m14-1313

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 47 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–101 of 101

Metadata

Authors
Linas, B. P., Barter, D. M., Morgan, J. R., Pho, M. T., Leff, J. A., Schackman, B. R., Horsburgh, C. R., Assoumou, S. A., Salomon, J. A., Weinstein, M. C., Freedberg, K. A., & Kim, A. Y.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2015-05-05
Volume
162
Issue
9
Pages
619-629
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2065146174
Cited by
101
References
47
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 15
FWCI
14.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA027379, R01DA031059)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI042006, R37AI042006, P30AI042853)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatitis C virus research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Keywords
hepatitis C virus, HCV genotype 2, HCV genotype 3, sofosbuvir, cost-effectiveness, pegylated interferon and ribavirin, liver cirrhosis, treatment-naive patients, treatment-experienced patients, quality-adjusted life years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, drug cost reduction, willingness-to-pay threshold, chronic hepatitis C treatment, United States
MeSH terms
Sofosbuvir, Antiviral Agents, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Genotype, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Markov Chains, Monte Carlo Method, Ribavirin, United States, Uridine Monophosphate, Interferon-alpha, Disease Progression, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Hepatitis C, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review