Cited by 21Healthcare Quality and ManagementHealth Policy Implementation SciencePatient Safety and Medication Errors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improvement Interventions Are Social Treatments, Not Pills

Davidoff, Frank·2014·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Editorials7 October 2014Improvement Interventions Are Social Treatments, Not PillsFrank Davidoff, MDFrank Davidoff, MDFrom Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/M14-1789 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Even the most effective medical treatment (test, drug, or procedure) provides its full benefit only if it is applied to the right patient, in the right way and at the right time, every time. Recognition of the unfortunate reality that effective treatments are often applied inconsistently and inappropriately (1) has spurred development of a "science" of health care improvement. Derived in part from initiatives in industry, this nascent discipline is essentially a systematized version of experiential learning (2), informed by a philosophy that encompasses an understanding of human organizations, the nature of variation, and aspects of human psychology (3). Improvement ...References1. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Pr; 2001. Google Scholar2. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PTR Prentice Hall; 1984. Google Scholar3. Perla RJ, Provost LP, Parry GJ. Seven propositions of the science of improvement: exploring foundations. Qual Manag Health Care. 2013;22:170-86. [PMID: 23807130] doi:10.1097/QMH.0b013e31829a6a15 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Goldman LE, Sarkar U, Kessell E, Guzman D, Schneidermann M, Pierluissi E, et al. Support from hospital to home for elders. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:472-81. doi:10.7326/M14-0094 LinkGoogle Scholar5. Goodman SN. Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 1: The P value fallacy. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:995-1004. [PMID: 10383371] LinkGoogle Scholar6. Lipsey MW. Theory as method: small theories of treatments. New Directions for Program Evaluation. 1993;57:5-38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar7. Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61:173-90. [PMID: 16122896] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Bucher JA, Houts PS, Ades T, eds. American Cancer Society Complete Guide to Family Caregiving. 2nd ed. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2011. Google Scholar9. Provost LP, Murray SK. The Health Care Data Guide: Learning from Data for Improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2011. Google Scholar10. St Clair T, Cook TD, Hallberg K. Examining the internal validity and statistical precision of comparative interrupted time series design by comparison with a randomized experiment. Am J Evaluation. 2014;35:311-27. doi:10.1177/1098214014527337 CrossrefGoogle Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: From Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.Acknowledgment: The author thanks Peter Houts and Laura Leviton for contributing important input to this editorial.Disclosures: The author has disclosed no conflicts of interest. The form can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterest Forms.do?msNum=M14-1789.Corresponding Author: Frank Davidoff, MD, 143 Garden Street, Wethersfield, CT 06109. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoSupport From Hospital to Home for Elders L. Elizabeth Goldman , Urmimala Sarkar , Eric Kessell , David Guzman , Michelle Schneidermann , Edgar Pierluissi , Barbara Walter , Eric Vittinghoff , Jeff Critchfield , and Margot Kushel Support From Hospital to Home for Elders L. Elizabeth Goldman , Urmimala Sarkar , Eric Kessell , David Guzman , Michelle Schneidermann , Edgar Pierluissi , Barbara Walter , Eric Vittinghoff , Jeff Critchfield , and Margot Kushel Improvement Interventions Joanne Lynn Improvement Interventions Sarah L. Szanton , Bruce Leff , and Laura N. Gitlin Improvement Interventions Frank Davidoff Improvement Interventions Frank Davidoff Improvement Interventions Sarah L. Szanton , Bruce Leff , and Laura N. Gitlin Improvement Interventions Joanne Lynn Metrics Cited ByChanging Health-Related Behaviors 2: On Improving the Value of Health SpendingWhy is reporting quality improvement so hard? A qualitative study in perioperative careResearch versus practice in quality improvement? Understanding how we can bridge the gapSalzburg Global Seminar Session 565—'Better Health Care: how do we learn about improvement?'Workflow standardization of a novel team care model to improve chronic care: a quasi-experimental studyImplementing, improving and learning: cross-country lessons learned from the African Health InitiativeData-driven quality improvement in low-and middle-income country health systems:

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m14-1789

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in the interests and practices of improvers and researchers explain the underlying distinctions between improvement projects and research studies.

    “It is in part these differences in the interests and practices of improvers and researchers that explain the underlying distinctions between improvement projects and research studies.14”

    From Demystifying theory and its use in improvement (2015) · cites this paper as [14]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Davidoff, F.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Davidoff, Frank
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2014-10-07
Volume
161
Issue
7
Pages
526-527
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2080539645
Cited by
21
References
9
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
health service improvement, quality improvement intervention, social treatment, experiential learning, organizational psychology, evidence-based medicine, patient-centered care, patient satisfaction, patient experience, patient-centered medical home, patient-centered outcomes research
MeSH terms
Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Nursing Care, Patient Discharge, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Readmission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review