Cited by 206Osteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPhysical Activity and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative Effectiveness of Tai Chi Versus Physical Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Trial

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few remedies effectively treat long-term pain and disability from knee osteoarthritis. Studies suggest that Tai Chi alleviates symptoms, but no trials have directly compared Tai Chi with standard therapies for osteoarthritis. OBJECTIVE: To compare Tai Chi with standard physical therapy for patients with knee osteoarthritis. DESIGN: Randomized, 52-week, single-blind comparative effectiveness trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01258985). SETTING: An urban tertiary care academic hospital. PATIENTS: 204 participants with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (mean age, 60 years; 70% women; 53% white). INTERVENTION: Tai Chi (2 times per week for 12 weeks) or standard physical therapy (2 times per week for 6 weeks, followed by 6 weeks of monitored home exercise). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included physical function, depression, medication use, and quality of life. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, the WOMAC score was substantially reduced in both groups (Tai Chi, 167 points [95% CI, 145 to 190 points]; physical therapy, 143 points [CI, 119 to 167 points]). The between-group difference was not significant (24 points [CI, -10 to 58 points]). Both groups also showed similar clinically significant improvement in most secondary outcomes, and the benefits were maintained up to 52 weeks. Of note, the Tai Chi group had significantly greater improvements in depression and the physical component of quality of life. The benefit of Tai Chi was consistent across instructors. No serious adverse events occurred. LIMITATION: Patients were aware of their treatment group assignment, and the generalizability of the findings to other settings remains undetermined. CONCLUSION: Tai Chi produced beneficial effects similar to those of a standard course of physical therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health of the National Institutes of Health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m15-2143

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bellamy N, 1997, J Rheumatol, 24, 799
  2. Bellamy N, 1988, J Rheumatol, 15, 1833
  3. King S, 1999, J Rheumatol, 26, 2233
  4. Pham T, 2003, J Rheumatol, 30, 1648
  5. Baker KR, 2001, J Rheumatol, 28, 1655
  6. 10.1056/NEJMoa0912611 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–206 of 206

Metadata

Authors
Wang, C., Schmid, C. H., Iversen, M. D., Harvey, W. F., Fielding, R. A., Driban, J. B., Price, L. L., Wong, J. B., Reid, K. F., Rones, R., & McAlindon, T.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2016-07-19
Volume
165
Issue
2
Pages
77-86
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2397437154
Cited by
206
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7
FWCI
16.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Annals of Internal Medicine
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (58-1950-4-003, 1P30AG031679)
  • Pfizer
  • Rheumatology Research Foundation
  • Brown University
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
  • Astellas Pharma
  • European League Against Rheumatism
  • Fidia Farmaceutici
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000073, UL1TR001064, 1P30AG031679, 5p30ag031679-15)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30-AG031679)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025752)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (RR025752)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K24AT007323, R01AT005521)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD065688)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
Tai Chi, knee osteoarthritis, physiotherapy, comparative effectiveness, exercise therapy, WOMAC, depression, quality of life, physical function, home-based exercise, complementary and integrative health
MeSH terms
Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Tai Ji, Physical Therapy Modalities, Comparative Effectiveness Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review