Cited by 50Obesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health PracticesPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Maintenance of Weight Loss After Initiation of Nutrition Training: A Randomized Trial

Open access
Voils, Corrine I., Olsen, Maren K., Gierisch, Jennifer M., McVay, Megan A., Grubber, Janet M., Gaillard, Leslie, Bolton, Jamiyla, Maciejewski, Matthew L. +2 more·2017·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Weight regain after successful weight loss interventions is common. OBJECTIVE: To establish the efficacy of a weight loss maintenance program compared with usual care in obese adults. DESIGN: 2-group, parallel, randomized trial stratified by initial weight loss (<10 kg vs. ≥10 kg), conducted from 20 August 2012 to 18 December 2015. Outcome assessors were blinded to treatment assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01357551). SETTING: 3 primary care clinics at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Durham and Raleigh, North Carolina. PATIENTS: Obese outpatients (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) who lost 4 kg or more of body weight during a 16-week, group-based weight loss program. INTERVENTION: The maintenance intervention, delivered primarily by telephone, addressed satisfaction with outcomes, relapse-prevention planning, self-monitoring, and social support. Usual care involved no contact except for study measurements. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was mean weight regain at week 56. Secondary outcomes included self-reported caloric intake, walking, and moderate physical activity. RESULTS: Of 504 patients in the initial program, 222 lost at least 4 kg of body weight and were randomly assigned to maintenance (n = 110) or usual care (n = 112). Retention was 85%. Most patients were middle-aged white men. Mean weight loss during initiation was 7.2 kg (SD, 3.1); mean weight at randomization was 103.6 kg (SD, 20.4). Estimated mean weight regain was statistically significantly lower in the intervention (0.75 kg) than the usual care (2.36 kg) group (estimated mean difference, 1.60 kg [95% CI, 0.07 to 3.13 kg]; P = 0.040). No statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes were seen at 56 weeks. No adverse events directly attributable to the intervention were observed. LIMITATIONS: Results may not generalize to other settings or populations. Dietary intake and physical activity were self-reported. Duration was limited to 56 weeks. CONCLUSION: An intervention focused on maintenance-specific strategies and delivered in a resource-conserving way modestly slowed the rate of weight regain in obese adults. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m16-2160

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although research is mixed, several studies show improved weight loss outcomes in patients receiving weight maintenance-specific training compared with those receiving only traditional weight loss training.

    “Although the research is mixed, several studies show improved weight loss outcomes in patients receiving weight maintenance-specific training, compared with those who only receive traditional weight loss training76–79.”

    From Maintenance of Lost Weight and Long-Term Management of Obesity (2018) · cites this paper as [78]

    The Abstract Results report significantly less weight regain with maintenance-specific training, and the Discussion compares this finding with other maintenance trials. However, this study compared the intervention with usual care, which involved no contact except study measurements—not with continued traditional weight-loss training. The cited paper therefore supports the benefit of maintenance training, but not the stated comparator. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [24]Fitzmaurice G Laird N Ware J Applied Longitudinal Analysis Hoboken, NJ Wiley 2004
  2. [25]Diggle PJ Heagerty P Liang K Zeger SL Analysis of Longitudinal Data New York Oxford Univ Pr 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Voils, C. I., Olsen, M. K., Gierisch, J. M., McVay, M. A., Grubber, J. M., Gaillard, L., Bolton, J., Maciejewski, M. L., Strawbridge, E., & Yancy, W. S.
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2017-04-04
Volume
166
Issue
7
Pages
463-471
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2593839531
Cited by
50
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Services Research and Development (IIR 11-040, RCS 14-443, RCS 10-391)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23 HL127334)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
weight loss maintenance, weight regain, obesity, nutrition training, telephone-delivered intervention, relapse prevention, self-monitoring, social support, veterans, physical activity, energy intake
MeSH terms
Health Expenditures, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Social Support, Weight Loss, Exercise, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Costs, Patient Satisfaction, Directive Counseling, Secondary Prevention, Weight Reduction Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review