Cited by 98Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Associations Between Marijuana Use and Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Open access
Ravi, Divya, Ghasemiesfe, Mehrnaz, Korenstein, Deborah, Cascino, Thomas, Keyhani, Salomeh·2018·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background: Marijuana use is increasing in the United States, and its effect on cardiovascular health is unknown. Purpose: To review harms and benefits of marijuana use in relation to cardiovascular risk factors and clinical outcomes. Data Sources: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library between 1 January 1975 and 30 September 2017. Study Selection: Observational studies that were published in English, enrolled adults using any form of marijuana, and reported on vascular risk factors (hyperglycemia, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obesity) or on outcomes (stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality in cardiovascular cohorts). Data Extraction: Study characteristics and quality were assessed by 4 reviewers independently; strength of evidence for each outcome was graded by consensus. Data Synthesis: 13 and 11 studies examined associations between marijuana use and cardiovascular risk factors and clinical outcomes, respectively. Although 6 studies suggested a metabolic benefit from marijuana use, they were based on cross-sectional designs and were not supported by prospective studies. Evidence examining the effect of marijuana on diabetes, dyslipidemia, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular and all-cause mortality was insufficient. Although the current literature includes several long-term prospective studies, they are limited by recall bias, inadequate exposure assessment, minimal marijuana exposure, and a predominance of low-risk cohorts. Limitation: Poor- or moderate-quality data, inadequate assessment of marijuana exposure and minimal exposure in the populations studied, and variation in study design. Conclusion: Evidence examining the effect of marijuana on cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes, including stroke and myocardial infarction, is insufficient. Primary Funding Source: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (PROSPERO: CRD42016051297).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m17-1548

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although no definitive causal effects have been established, there are case reports of stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with use of cannabis.

    “Although no definitive causal effects have been established, there are case reports of stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with use of cannabis.120,121”

    From Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cannabis and Cannabinoid-Based Medicines in the Management of Chronic Pain and Co-Occurring Conditions (2024) · cites this paper as [121]

    The Conclusion says evidence on marijuana’s cardiovascular effects, including stroke and myocardial infarction, is insufficient. The Results discuss myocardial infarction, stroke, and irregular heartbeat, but the Methods (Study Selection) explicitly exclude case reports and case series. This paper therefore supports the uncertainty and discussion of these outcomes, not the claim that it reports case reports of all three. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [51]National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research Washington, DC: National Academies Pr; 2017. 28182367

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ravi, D., Ghasemiesfe, M., Korenstein, D., Cascino, T., & Keyhani, S.
Affiliations
  • The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education (US)
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2018-02-06
Volume
168
Issue
3
Pages
187-194
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2788920571
Cited by
98
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1R01HL130484-01A1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
cannabis use, cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular outcomes, stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, obesity, hyperglycemia
MeSH terms
Marijuana Use, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Risk Factors, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review