Cited by 82Infection Control and VentilationCOVID-19 Prevention and ImpactCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Masks and Face Coverings for the Lay Public: A Narrative Update

Open access
Czypionka, Thomas, Greenhalgh, Trisha, Bassler, Dirk, Bryant, Manuel B.·2021·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

In an interesting recent paper, DeAngelo and DeAngelo (2006) highlight that Miller and Modigliani's (1961) proof of dividend irrelevance is based on the assumption that the amount of dividends distributed to shareholders is equal or greater than the free cash flow generated by the fixed investment policy.They claim that, if retention is allowed, dividend policy is not irrelevant.This paper clarifies and reinterprets DeAngelo and DeAngelo's result: Retention itself has not to do with dividend irrelevance, which holds even in case of retention.The key assumption has to do with the NPV of the extra funds (either retained or raised): If NPV is zero, dividend irrelevance applies.Yet, the dichotomy retention/no-retention is useful, because if agency problems are present, managers tend to retain funds and invest them in negative-NPV projects, and therefore the zero-NPV assumption must be removed, so that dividend irrelevance does not apply any more.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m20-6625

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Copeland, T.E., Koller, T. and Murrin, J. (2000) Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies, 3 rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Damodaran, A. (2006a) Damodaran on Valuation. Security Analysis for Investment and Corporate Finance, second edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Damodaran, A. (2006b) Valuation approaches and metrics: a survey of the theory and evidence. Working paper (November). Available at SSRN: <http://www.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/papers/valuesurvey.pdf>. Originally published in Foundations and Trends ® in Finance, 1(8), 693-784, 2005.
  4. DeAngelo, H. and DeAngelo, L. (2006). The irrelevance of the MM dividend irrelevance theorem. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2), 293-315.
  5. DeAngelo, H. and DeAngelo, L. (2007) Payout policy pedagogy: what matters and why. European Financial Management, 13(1), 11-27.
  6. Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
  7. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency theory, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
  8. Magni, C.A. and Vélez-Pareja, I. (2009). Potential dividends versus actual cash flows in firm valuation, The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, forthcoming.
  9. Miller, M. and Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business, 34, 411-433.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Czypionka, T., Greenhalgh, T., Bassler, D., & Bryant, M. B.
Affiliations
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2021-04
Volume
174
Issue
4
Pages
511-520
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W3095925820
Cited by
82
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 24
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (104830/Z/14/Z)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10031)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/V010069/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
face masks, face coverings, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, airborne transmission, source control, mask comfort, risk compensation, fomite transmission, individual liberty, infection control
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Masks, Infection Control, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review