The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines for Company-Sponsored Biomedical Research: 2022 Update
Abstract
These updated Good Publication Practice (GPP) guidelines include recommendations for publishing company-sponsored biomedical research. The GPP guidelines apply to peer-reviewed or peer-oriented biomedical publications, such as manuscripts, meeting presentations, posters, and abstracts, as well as enhanced content, such as plain-language summaries. The current GPP guidelines incorporate guidance on ethics and transparency as well as the planning, development, review, and approval of biomedical publications and policies and procedures that describe these practices. Supplemental materials lay out processes for steering committees, publication plans, publication working groups, determining authorship, and documentation. Information about new topics, such as alliances and working with patients, has been included where appropriate within these supplemental materials. Incorporating the principles and best practices presented in these GPP guidelines will result in increased transparency and a firm ethical footing. This guidance is also intended to enable the compliant incorporation of new and emerging publication tools for the ethical publication of company-sponsored research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Responding to COVID-19: how to navigate a public health emergency legally and ethically
Gostin, L. O., Friedman, E. A., & Wetter, S. A. (2020) · Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.1090 · Cited by 258 · cited 1×
“Publication activities may be adjusted in response to emerging health care situations to align with medical and public health needs and ethics (34).”
Background
Cited by
Vauleon, S., Schutz, K., Massonnet, B., Gruben, N., Manchester, M., Buehler, A., Schick, E., Boak, L., & Hawellek, D. J. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-32630-4 · Cited by 14
Mehta, N., Felder, R. M., Kodish, E., Imrey, P. B., & Frankel, R. M. (2026) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-026-00212-3 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- DeTora, L. M., Toroser, D., Sykes, A., Vanderlinden, C., Plunkett, F. J., Lane, T., Hanekamp, E., Dormer, L., DiBiasi, F., Bridges, D., Baltzer, L., & Citrome, L.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 175
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1298-1304
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W4293733558
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 43.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines for Company-Sponsored Biomedical Research: 2022 Update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/m22-1460
- The paper
- DeTora, L. M., Toroser, D., Sykes, A., Vanderlinden, C., Plunkett, F. J., Lane, T., Hanekamp, E., Dormer, L., DiBiasi, F., Bridges, D., Baltzer, L., & Citrome, L. (2022). Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines for Company-Sponsored Biomedical Research: 2022 Update. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/m22-1460
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
