Cited by 10Healthcare Policy and ManagementHospital Admissions and OutcomesPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Hospital Outcomes for Patients Treated by Allopathic Versus Osteopathic Hospitalists

Miyawaki, Atsushi, Jena, Anupam B., Gross, Nate, Tsugawa, Yusuke·2023·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The United States has 2 types of degree programs that educate physicians: allopathic and osteopathic medical schools. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether quality and costs of care differ between hospitalized Medicare patients treated by allopathic or osteopathic physicians. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Medicare claims data. PATIENTS: 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries hospitalized with a medical condition during 2016 to 2019 and treated by hospitalists. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was 30-day patient mortality. The secondary outcomes were 30-day readmission, length of stay (LOS), and health care spending (Part B spending). Multivariable regression models adjusted for patient and physician characteristics and their hospital-level averages (to effectively estimate differences within hospitals) were estimated. RESULTS: = 0.85). LIMITATION: Data were limited to elderly Medicare patients hospitalized with medical conditions. CONCLUSION: The quality and costs of care were similar between allopathic and osteopathic hospitalists when they cared for elderly patients and worked as the principal physician in a team of health care professionals that often included other allopathic and osteopathic physicians. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m22-3723

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fordyce MA, 2012, Fam Med, 44, 396
  2. Swallow CS, 2000, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 100, 681
  3. Freeman E, 2010, J Am Osteopath Assoc, 110, 150

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Miyawaki, A., Jena, A. B., Gross, N., & Tsugawa, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • Doximity (United States) (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2023-06
Volume
176
Issue
6
Pages
798-806
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W4378635621
Cited by
10
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01 AG068633)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
osteopathic physicians, allopathic physicians, hospitalists, Medicare beneficiaries, 30-day mortality, hospital readmission, length of hospital stay, health care costs, quality of care, elderly patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Medicare, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Humans, United States, Hospitalists, Osteopathic Physicians

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review