Cited by 49Employment and Welfare StudiesMental Health Treatment and AccessCOVID-19 and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gender differences in mental health during the economic crisis

Open access
Gili, Margalida, López-Navarro, Emilio, Castro, Adoración, Homar, Clara, Navarro, Capilla, García-Toro, Mauro, García-Campayo, Javier, Roca, Miquel·2016·Psicothema

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Economic crises have a negative effect on mental health. Little evidence has been published on the impact of economic downturns on male and female. The aim of the study was to analyze gender differences in specific mental disorders in primary care during the current economic recession in Spain. METHOD: A total of 7,914 patients in 2006 and 5,876 patients in 2010 were recruited to collect sociodemographic data and the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2010 the prevalence of Major Depressive Disorder increased 155.7% in men and 104.9% in women; Generalized Anxiety Disorder increased 98.3% in men and 71.3% in women; and Multisomatoform Disorder increased 100.05% in men and 37% in women. The effect of the Employment confounder was significant across all comparisons: Major Depressive Disorder Generalized Odds Ratio=2.557 for Men (p<.001), 2.046 for Women (p=.002); Generalized Anxiety Disorder Generalized Odds Ratio= 2.153 (p<.001) for Men, 1.546 for Women (p<.001); and for Non-specific Multisomatoform Disorder Generalized Odds Ratio=1.680 for Men (p<.001) and 1.301 for women (p=.014). CONCLUSION: Overall prevalence of mental disorders increased significantly between 2006 and 2010, especially in males, who are more sensitive to the effect of the current economic recession than women.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7334/psicothema2015.288

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gili, M., López-Navarro, E., Castro, A., Homar, C., Navarro, C., García-Toro, M., García-Campayo, J., & Roca, M.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de les Illes Balears (ES)
  • University of Balearic
  • University of Zaragoza
Venue
Psicothema
Published
2016-11-01
Volume
4
Issue
28
Pages
407-413
ISSN
  • 0214-9915 (ISSN-L)
  • 1886-144X
OpenAlex
W2573066433
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5
FWCI
9.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psicothema (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zaguan (University of Zaragoza Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Docusalut (Conselleria de Salut i Consum del Govern de les Illes Balears) (submittedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
gender differences, mental illness, economic recession, economic crisis, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, somatoform disorders, employment status, prevalence, primary care, Spain
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Spain, Prevalence, Sex Distribution, Young Adult, Economic Recession

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review