Cited by 196Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementFoot and Ankle SurgeryLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

Ankle equinus deformity and its relationship to high plantar pressure in a large population with diabetes mellitus.

Lavery, Lawrence A., Armstrong, David G., Boulton, Andrew J. M.·2002·Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

Abstract

The authors undertook a study to evaluate the prevalence of ankle equinus and its potential relationship to high plantar pressure in a large, urban population with diabetes mellitus. The first 1,666 consecutive people with diabetes (50.3% male; mean [+/-SD] age, 69.1 +/- 11.1 years) presenting to a large, urban, managed-care outpatient clinic were enrolled in this longitudinal, 2-year outcomes study. Patients received a standardized medical and musculoskeletal assessment at the time of enrollment, including evaluation at an onsite gait laboratory. Equinus was defined as less than 0 degrees of dorsiflexion at the ankle. The overall prevalence of equinus in this population was 10.3%. Patients with equinus had significantly higher peak plantar pressures than those without the deformity and were at nearly three times greater risk for presenting with elevated plantar pressures. There were no significant differences in age, weight, or sex between the two groups. However, patients with equinus had a significantly longer duration of diabetes than those without equinus. Having a high index of suspicion for this deformity and subsequently addressing it through conservative or surgical means may help to reduce the risk of foot ulceration and amputation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7547/87507315-92-9-479

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among patients with a new diabetic foot ulcer, those who had been seen by a podiatrist for preventive care in the year before ulcer development had a lower risk of major lower extremity amputation relative to those who had not seen a podiatrist in the past year (1.20% vs 1.84%; OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51-0.72).

    “Among patients with a new diabetic foot ulcer, those who had been seen by a podiatrist for preventive care in the year before ulcer development had a lower risk of major lower extremity amputation relative to those who had not seen a podiatrist in the past year(1.20%vs1.84%;OR,0.61[95%CI,0.51-0.72];P< .001).27”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lavery, L. A., Armstrong, D. G., & Boulton, A. J. M.
Affiliations
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
  • Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • University of Miami (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2002-10
Volume
92
Issue
9
Pages
479-482
ISSN
  • 1930-8264 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7315
OpenAlex
W2027846313
Cited by
196
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
plantar pressure, diabetes mellitus, prevalence, foot ulcer, amputation risk, ankle dorsiflexion, diabetes duration, gait analysis, diabetic foot
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Awards and Prizes, Diabetes Mellitus, Equinus Deformity, Female, Foot, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Pressure, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review