CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Self-Reliant Science: The Impact of the Cold War on Science in Socialist China

Schmalzer, Sigrid·2014·Science and Technology in the Global Cold War
DOI 10.7551/mitpress/10179.003.0005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/10179.003.0005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Amin would have been unlikely to know how much self-reliance in Chinese fields was elevated to the level of economic creed, including pushing local agricultural experimentation to an extremely advanced level, in ways that anticipated agro-ecological approaches to rural development.

    “Perhaps taken in by Mao's enthrallment with tractors, Amin would have been unlikely to know how much self-reliance in Chinese fields was elevated to the level of economic creed, including pushing local agricultural experimentation to an extremely advanced level, in ways that once again anticipated agro-ecological approaches to rural development (Shih-chang 1972;Schmalzer 2014).16”

    From The hidden legacy of Samir Amin: delinking’s ecological foundation (2021) · cites this paper as Schmalzer 2014

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schmalzer, S.
Venue
Science and Technology in the Global Cold War
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2014-10-31
Pages
75-106
DOI
10.7551/mitpress/10179.003.0005
Cited by
10
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review