This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture
Abstract
Why the troll problem is actually a culture problem: how online trolling fits comfortably within today's media landscape. Internet trolls live to upset as many people as possible, using all the technical and psychological tools at their disposal. They gleefully whip the media into a frenzy over a fake teen drug crisis; they post offensive messages on Facebook memorial pages, traumatizing grief-stricken friends and family; they use unabashedly racist language and images. They take pleasure in ruining a complete stranger's day and find amusement in their victim's anguish. In short, trolling is the obstacle to a kinder, gentler Internet. To quote a famous Internet meme, trolling is why we can't have nice things online. Or at least that's what we have been led to believe. In this provocative book, Whitney Phillips argues that trolling, widely condemned as obscene and deviant, actually fits comfortably within the contemporary media landscape. Trolling may be obscene, but, Phillips argues, it isn't all that deviant. Trolls' actions are born of and fueled by culturally sanctioned impulses—which are just as damaging as the trolls' most disruptive behaviors. Phillips describes, for example, the relationship between trolling and sensationalist corporate media—pointing out that for trolls, exploitation is a leisure activity; for media, it's a business strategy. She shows how trolls, “the grimacing poster children for a socially networked world,” align with social media. And she documents how trolls, in addition to parroting media tropes, also offer a grotesque pantomime of dominant cultural tropes, including gendered notions of dominance and success and an ideology of entitlement. We don't just have a trolling problem, Phillips argues; we have a culture problem. This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things isn't only about trolls; it's about a culture in which trolls thrive.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Coordinated harassment campaigns are increasingly organized by groups that synchronously flood a target's social media feeds.
“Coordinated harassment campaigns are increasingly organized by more-and-less organized groups, who synchronously flood a target's social media feeds (Heron, Belford, & Goker, 2014;Phillips, 2015).”
From Bot-based collective blocklists in Twitter: the counterpublic moderation of harassment in a networked public space (2016) · cites this paper as Phillips, 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 677
- Authors
- Phillips, W.
- Corresponding author
- Phillips, Whitney
- ORCID
- Phillips, Whitney
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2015-02-27
- OpenAlex
- W4253468258
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 61 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 47.97
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
- Keywords
- trolling, internet culture, media sensationalism, corporate media, social media, cultural tropes, entitlement, deviance, online harassment, media spectacle
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review